Sabtu, 07 Maret 2020

The Market Is Rocky. Will Target-Date Funds Change Their Strategy? - The New York Times

The professionals are in charge, and they may just protect you from yourself.

Investment pros now control how much stock everyday investors own to a much greater extent than they did when the bottom fell out of the markets in 2008. The big reason: the rapid growth of target-date funds and similar vehicles, which most people set and forget — and suddenly remember when the market goes bonkers.

These vehicles divide your money between stocks and other investments and adjust that mix as the calender pages flip closer to retirement.

The growth of these funds is staggering: The amount of workplace retirement plan money in target-date funds just passed $1 trillion, accounting for 21 percent of the total, according to an analysis from BrightScope and the Investment Company Institute. That’s up from $185 billion in 2009. And 59 percent of new contributions into workplace retirement plans last year went into these types of funds, according to a report from Vanguard.

The coronavirus outbreak has sent share prices plunging, but the managers in charge of these funds are all-in on the long term.

Last month, T. Rowe Price announced that it was increasing allocations to stocks for some investors. (Stop snickering — the change is being phased over two years, so the fact that the past month’s stock market chart looks so grim does not mean its customers have suffered.)

All the big managers of target-date funds now have many years of historical data to work with. When they make changes — and they don’t do it very often — they are often aiming to get all of us to save and invest with the long run in mind.

And they do it all with an investment vehicle custom-built to keep people from doing dumb things with their life savings.

Lest we forget, we are all guinea pigs in an enormous experiment that would be laughable if it did not involve a substantial portion of our net worth. The truth is, we’re just making it up as we go along with 401(k)’s and similar workplace retirement plans.

Pension fund managers used to control our retirement savings, and we’d get a guaranteed check for life. Those guarantees were expensive, so corporations decided not to make them anymore. That’s how many of us ended up with 401(k) plans, where workers decide how to invest the money and there are no guarantees.

There were many problems in the early days. Lots of people bought too much stock and then sold at the wrong time. Or they stayed in cash out of fear, and couldn’t even keep up with inflation.

“We’re putting it all in your hands and saying that we want you to be an asset allocation expert and maybe an economist,” said Jerome Clark, a T. Rowe Price target-date portfolio manager. “People just don’t have the expertise or the time.”

Target-date funds are supposed to solve those problems. The fund managers bring the expertise, and you need only make time to name the amount you’re saving and your retirement year (or a 529 plan that uses the funds the date your child will start college, after the requisite gap year).

The fund managers create an asset allocation of stocks, bonds, cash and sometimes real estate or commodities or other investments. Then, they decide what fraction of your money ought to be in each, and make sure it stays that way as the markets gyrate. Finally, they change those ratios as you get closer to — or farther into — retirement or taking money out for tuition.

It was automatic, actually.

Among the many known failures of the 401(k) experiment is this: In the early years, putting money into a 401(k) was a choice. We don’t yet know how many people are going to run out of money in the 2040s because they didn’t save enough in the 1980s, but there will be some.

To keep even more people from running out of money, many employers and the companies that help them have cooked up several strategies. First, sign everyone up. Second, raise the amount they save by, say, a percentage point each year. Workers can put a stop to either one of these things, but most don’t.

Then, the default: Rather than putting people into low-risk investments, channel their savings into target-date funds that correlate with their age. Once the federal government blessed this move, assets flooded the funds.

The target-date allocations at Charles Schwab, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price and Vanguard are not all alike. But their fund managers share a common goal: When you itch to make drastic portfolio changes (say, this very weekend!), they want to stop you.

We humans have a natural tendency toward greed and fear. That can lead us to buy more stock when prices are rising and sell when we see lots of red lines pointing downward and want to avoid the pain. These are also the worst possible instincts investors can have.

The target-date gurus at Charles Schwab, who haven’t made substantial changes to their stock-bond allocations since 2008, fielded my questions about the here and now with some degree of practiced weariness.

Jake Gilliam, head client portfolio strategist for the group that includes target-date funds, is old enough to remember 2006, when the stock market was a rocket ship and people were telling him that his funds did not take enough risk. He remembers 2008, when people asked why his funds were taking so much risk. And he remembers 2018, when the ever-climbing S&P 500 had people once again questioning whether his funds were aggressive enough.

“We have been here before,” he said. “I’ve seen the full cycle twice now.”

Mr. Clark at T. Rowe Price watched how all of us reacted to the stock market fiasco a decade ago, and he has the receipts. Non-target date investors were four times more likely to make a portfolio move during extreme market conditions. Put another way, target-date investors mostly avoided the two worst outcomes: selling low and staying on the sidelines during the market rally. That’s probably because their portfolios were just conservative enough that their balances didn’t move as violently as the U.S. stock market did.

That brings us to T. Rowe Price’s recent decision to raise the stock exposure of its youngest and oldest investors — but not the ones closest to retirement.

Why exclude those closer to age 65? Well, they tend to feel the biggest feelings as they’re moving from earning a salary and saving money to spending it and perhaps not earning at all. Strong emotions like that could lead them to cash out, which would have been a very bad thing to do in, say, 2009. So T. Rowe Price decided not to increase their stock allocations — for now, at least — lest they do something rash.

Target-date funds check a lot of boxes. They’re automatic, they’re built for the long term and they’re usually managed in a thoughtful manner.

But they’re far from perfect.

Many function as mutual funds containing other mutual funds, which can mean layers of fees. The “stock” allocation might not be to your taste — it could contain too much or too little exposure to international companies or smaller businesses.

The stock mix can vary in other ways, too. It might be every stock in a particular index, or a smaller number of stocks that managers pick in hopes of generating higher returns. The latter is very hard to do over time, and trying to do so costs more in fees than simply creating an index fund.

Ask your fund company about all of that. Just don’t expect the fund managers to have much to say today that is all that different from last month or last year.

Their goal remains the same, said Andrew Dierdorf, a portfolio member for Fidelity’s target-date operation. They want you to behave yourself.

“One of the things we’re always thinking about, in good times and challenging times, is getting the investor to stay invested so they can achieve their long-run objectives,” he said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiUWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDMvMDcveW91ci1tb25leS90YXJnZXQtZGF0ZS1mdW5kcy1zdG9jay1tYXJrZXQuaHRtbNIBVWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDMvMDcveW91ci1tb25leS90YXJnZXQtZGF0ZS1mdW5kcy1zdG9jay1tYXJrZXQuYW1wLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-03-07 17:15:20Z
CAIiENWCZXl3Fy4_Rs_xt7hbZFUqFwgEKg8IACoHCAowjuuKAzCWrzwwt4QY

When you sell during a panic you may miss the market's best days - CNBC

Panic selling not only locks in losses but also puts investors at risk for missing the market's best days.

Looking at data going back to 1930, Bank of America found that if an investor missed the S&P 500's 10 best days in each  decade, total returns would be just 91%, significantly below the 14,962% return for investors who held steady through the downturns.

The firm noted this eye-popping stat while urging investors to "avoid panic selling," pointing out that the "best days generally follow the worst days for stocks." 

Looking at the Dow Jones Industrial Average as a reference point, this pattern could be seen playing out this week. The 30-stock index posted sizable losses on three days this week, but it also enjoyed the two largest daily point gains on record and ended the week with a 1.8% gain.

Experts advise investors to avoid the impulse to time the market, which can be difficult even for professional traders.

Still, retail investors like to try. The popular trading app Robinhood recently experienced "an unprecedented load" that caused outages Monday and Tuesday. The outages prompted outrage on Twitter and at least one lawsuit from a trader claiming to have missed out on Monday's rally.

The stock market, meanwhile, remains in correction territory with the major averages all down more than 12% from their highs.

The Bank of America strategists, led by Savita Subramanian, noted that corrections are common. The firm said that a correction has occurred once a year on average since 1928, and that losses are typically recovered over the subsequent three months.

Additionally, the strategists don't see a bear market on the horizon. Currently 53% of the firm's bear market signposts are triggered. The list includes factors like consumer confidence and monetary policy. Since 1960, more than 80% have been triggered ahead of prior market peaks. 

That said, as the coronavirus outbreak continues to roil global markets, the firm is not as bullish as it was.  On Monday, it  cut its 2020 earnings per share estimate on the S&P 500 by 5%, while also lowering its 2020 year-end target on the index to 3,100.

"Negative headlines and panic selling are not good reasons to sell, but the coronavirus outbreak is now meaningfully impacting fundamentals," the firm said.

For investors who feel they have to do something during downturns, TD Ameritrade chief market strategist JJ Kinahan advises to make only small moves. "The problem most people have is they think all or none: think partials," he said.

"This also goes for the opportunities in the market. That is, if you see a stock at a level you like, you could buy some but perhaps not all," he added. "If the stock goes down you have an opportunity to buy more at a better price."

- CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed reporting.

Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis, and live business day programming from around the world.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuYmMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDMvMDcvd2hlbi15b3Utc2VsbC1kdXJpbmctYS1wYW5pYy15b3UtbWF5LW1pc3MtdGhlLW1hcmtldHMtYmVzdC1kYXlzLmh0bWzSAWhodHRwczovL3d3dy5jbmJjLmNvbS9hbXAvMjAyMC8wMy8wNy93aGVuLXlvdS1zZWxsLWR1cmluZy1hLXBhbmljLXlvdS1tYXktbWlzcy10aGUtbWFya2V0cy1iZXN0LWRheXMuaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-03-07 13:46:43Z
52780651492074

China January-February exports tumble, imports slow as coronavirus batters trade and business - Reuters

BEIJING (Reuters) - China’s exports contracted sharply in the first two months of the year, and imports slowed, as the health crisis triggered by the coronavirus outbreak caused massive disruptions to business operations, global supply chains and economic activity.

FILE PHOTO: Containers are seen at Yantian port in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China July 4, 2019. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo

The gloomy trade report is likely to reinforce fears that China’s economic growth halved in the first quarter to the weakest since 1990 as the epidemic and strict government containment measures crippled factory production and led to a sharp slump in demand.

Overseas shipments fell 17.2% in January-February from the same period a year earlier, customs data showed on Saturday, marking the steepest fall since February 2019.

That compared with a 14% drop tipped by a Reuters poll of analysts and a 7.9% gain in December.

Imports sank 4% from a year earlier, but were better than market expectations of a 15% drop. They had jumped 16.5% in December, buoyed in part by a preliminary Sino-U.S. trade deal.

China ran a trade deficit of $7.09 billion for the period, reversing an expected $24.6 billion surplus in the poll.

Factory activity contracted at the fastest pace ever in February, even worse than during the global financial crisis, an official manufacturing gauge showed last weekend, with a sharp slump in new orders. A private survey highlighted similarly dire conditions.

The epidemic has killed over 3,000 and infected more than 80,000 in China. Though the number of new infections in China is falling, and local governments are slowly relaxing emergency measures, analysts say many businesses are taking longer to reopen than expected, and may not return to normal production till April.

Those delays threaten an even longer and costlier spillover into the economies of China’s major trading partners, many of which rely heavily on Chinese-made parts and components.

China’s trade surplus with the United States for the first two months of the year stood at $25.37 billion, Reuters calculation based on Chinese customs data showed, much narrower than a surplus of $42.16 billion in the same period last year.

Soybean imports in the first two months of 2020 rose by 14.2% year-on-year as cargoes from the U.S. booked during a trade truce at the end of 2019 cleared customs.

After months of tensions and tariff hikes that dragged on bilateral trade, the world’s two biggest economies agreed an interim trade deal in January that cut some U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods in exchange for Chinese pledges to massively increase purchases of U.S. goods and services.

The U.S. expects China to honor these commitments despite the coronavirus outbreak, a senior U.S. official said in February.

VIRUS THREATENS GLOBAL RECESSION

The supply and demand shocks in China are likely to reverberate through global supply chains for months, and the rising number of virus cases and business disruptions in other countries is raising fears of a prolonged global slowdown or even recession.

In response, global policymakers have stepped up efforts to cushion the economic blow of the epidemic, with the U.S. Federal Reserve delivering an emergency rate cut last week.

Shortages of vital parts and components from China last month cost other countries and their industries $50 billion, a United Nations agency said on Wednesday.

The virus outbreak escalated in late January just as many businesses were winding down operations or closing for the long Lunar New Year holidays, and as hundreds of millions of Chinese were returning to their hometowns.

China customs said last month it would not release separate figures for January and would combine January and February instead, in line with how some of the country’s other major indicators are released early in the year, which is intended to smooth distortions created by the holidays.

Tough public measures such as restrictions on travel and quarantines meant many of these people were unable to return to their jobs in offices, factories and ports until only recently.

Some firms which have reopened have faced shortages of parts and other raw materials as well as labor, while others report inventories of finished goods such as steel are piling up as downstream customers like car plants slowly crank up production again.

Iron ore imports rose 1.5% over the first two months, supported by firm demand at steel mills even though the coronavirus outbreak had disrupted downstream sectors.

Parts of central Hubei province, the epicenter of the outbreak and a major transport and manufacturing center, are expected to remain under lockdown well into March.

Analysts at Nomura estimate only 44% of the businesses worst affected by the outbreak had resumed operation as of March 1, and 62.1% across the economy as a whole. As such, they forecast economic growth will slump to 2% in the first quarter year-on-year, from 6% in the previous quarter.

FILE PHOTO: People wearing face masks walk inside an office building at the Lujiazui financial district in Pudong, Shanghai, China as the country is hit by an outbreak of the novel coronavirus, February 10, 2020. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo

Beijing has already stepped up support measures, including offering cheap loans to affected businesses, and policy sources have told Reuters that more steps are expected as authorities try to cushion the epidemic’s impact on the economy.

China’s commerce ministry said on Thursday that more than 70% of foreign trade companies in the coastal provinces have resumed work.

But financial magazine Caixin reported this week that some companies were keeping machines running and lights open throughout the day even though they have no goods to produce, in a bid to allow managers and local officials to inflate the official work resumption rate. Reuters wasn’t able to verify this report.

Reporting by Gabriel Crossley and Lusha Zhang; Editing by Shri Navaratnam

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMioQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL3VzLWNoaW5hLWVjb25vbXktdHJhZGUvY2hpbmEtamFudWFyeS1mZWJydWFyeS1leHBvcnRzLXR1bWJsZS1pbXBvcnRzLXNsb3ctYXMtY29yb25hdmlydXMtYmF0dGVycy10cmFkZS1hbmQtYnVzaW5lc3MtaWRVU0tCTjIwVTA1UtIBNGh0dHBzOi8vbW9iaWxlLnJldXRlcnMuY29tL2FydGljbGUvYW1wL2lkVVNLQk4yMFUwNVI?oc=5

2020-03-07 07:38:42Z
52780649117215

Jumat, 06 Maret 2020

OPEC+ Talks Collapse Threatening Russia-Saudi Oil Alliance - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. OPEC+ Talks Collapse Threatening Russia-Saudi Oil Alliance  Bloomberg
  2. Oil prices plunge 8% after OPEC+ fails to agree on a massive production cut  CNBC
  3. Analysts Continue To Slash Oil Demand Growth Estimates  OilPrice.com
  4. Oil: Russia attracts all eyes – TDS  FXStreet
  5. OPEC+ fails to agree on massive supply cut, sending crude prices to 2017 lows  CNBC
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJsb29tYmVyZy5jb20vbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlcy8yMDIwLTAzLTA2L29wZWMtZmFpbHMtdG8tcmVhY2gtZGVhbC1hcy1ydXNzaWEtcmVmdXNlcy1kZWVwZXItb2lsLWN1dHPSAXFodHRwczovL3d3dy5ibG9vbWJlcmcuY29tL2FtcC9uZXdzL2FydGljbGVzLzIwMjAtMDMtMDYvb3BlYy1mYWlscy10by1yZWFjaC1kZWFsLWFzLXJ1c3NpYS1yZWZ1c2VzLWRlZXBlci1vaWwtY3V0cw?oc=5

2020-03-06 17:04:30Z
52780639491845

Opec and Russia in crunch talks over oil output cut - Financial Times

Talks between Opec and Russia over whether to cut oil production in response to the coronavirus outbreak were threatening to unravel on Friday, sending crude prices plunging more than 5 per cent to their lowest level in three years.

Russia, which has allied with Saudi Arabia and Opec since 2016 to help prop up oil markets, rejected calls from Opec to together curtail almost 4 per cent of global crude production with new output cuts, as a collapse in aviation and transport demand has sent prices down by a third since January.

As the two sides gathered at the Opec secretariat in Vienna, the start of the formal meeting of the so-called Opec+ group was delayed by more than five hours as ministers huddled in private meetings attempting to find common ground.

“A deal certainly can still emerge today, but right now it appears to be hanging in the balance,” said Amrita Sen at Energy Aspects.

On one side Russia briefed that it did not want to do any more than extend the group’s existing production deal, in place since before the coronavirus outbreak, to remove 2.1m barrels a day of oil production. Saudi Arabia has indicated it could walk away from the table unless Russia agrees to participate in a further 1.5m b/d cut.

The stand-off raises the prospect of the four-year-old alliance between two of the world’s largest oil producers weakening at a time when oil demand has slumped and the wider economy is being disrupted by a virus that threatens to become a global pandemic.

The oil industry is bracing for demand to potentially shrink in 2020 for the first time since the financial crisis and a breakdown in the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Russia would threaten even lower prices, which have already fallen by a third to below $50 a barrel since January.

Jamie Webster, an analyst at Boston Consulting Group’s Center for Energy Impact, said that if Opec and its allies did not announce a substantial cut then prices could fall to lows last seen in early 2016, when crude traded near $30 a barrel.

“They have to act decisively or prices are going to sink,” Mr Webster said.

On Thursday, Opec’s core members, not including Russia or other producers who have only allied with the group since 2016, first announced their plan to cut 1.5m b/d if joined by their partners. In a sign of how concerned they are by oil’s slide, they put out a statement late in the evening following additional discussions saying they wanted the deep cuts to last for the entire year, rather than just until the summer.

But as Russian energy minister Alexander Novak arrived back in the Austrian capital on Friday morning for meetings at the Opec secretariat, it became clear Russia was not on board. Tass, the Russian news service, reported the Russian delegation had rejected the plan before talks even commenced.

Saudi Arabian energy minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, the half brother of the de facto ruler of the kingdom, Mohammed bin Salman, is leading the Opec side in its push to get an agreement on the cuts.

But there are signs the kingdom may be prepared to walk away from the deal, believing the resultant drop in oil prices may eventually force a stronger agreement, while also hurting high-cost rivals like shale oil producers in the US.

“Saudi is willing to entertain a ‘what-if’ scenario in that if Russia doesn’t comply with incremental cuts the silver lining is a ‘reap what you sow’ moment for the oil market,” said Christyan Malek at JPMorgan. “Shale effectively shuts down and inventories fall.”

Russia too has indicated it can live with a lower oil price for a period and can see the benefit in squeezing shale producers, who have captured much of global oil demand growth for the past decade but are already struggling to make a profit.

With investors in the US increasingly wary of funding shale’s expansion, many in the market think now might be the time for countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia to put the sector under pressure by letting prices fall, though this tactic failed in 2014.

Analysts warn it would also be a very risky exercise given the impact of the coronavirus on the world economy.

Energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie estimates oil demand fell by as much as 2.7m b/d in the first quarter, or almost 3 per cent, with China — the world’s second-largest oil consumer after the US — seeing a sharp drop in economic activity as Beijing tried to curtail the spread of the virus.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, fell as much as 5 per cent on Friday to a low of $47.02 a barrel, its lowest since 2017, while US benchmark West Texas Intermediate hit a low of $43.17 a barrel.

Shares in the largest listed European oil and gas majors fell sharply, with BP and Royal Dutch Shell both down more than 4 per cent on the day. They have lost more than a fifth of their market capitalisation since mid-January.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzEwZjNlOWQyLTVmOTQtMTFlYS04MDMzLWZhNDBhMGQ2NWE5ONIBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzEwZjNlOWQyLTVmOTQtMTFlYS04MDMzLWZhNDBhMGQ2NWE5OA?oc=5

2020-03-06 14:18:00Z
52780639491845

Opec and Russia in crunch talks over oil output cut - Financial Times

Talks between Opec and Russia over whether to cut oil production in response to the coronavirus outbreak were threatening to unravel on Friday, sending crude prices plunging more than 5 per cent to their lowest level in three years.

Russia, which has allied with Saudi Arabia and Opec since 2016 to help prop up oil markets, rejected calls from Opec to together curtail almost 4 per cent of global crude production with new output cuts, as a collapse in aviation and transport demand has sent prices down by a third since January.

As the two sides gathered at the Opec secretariat in Vienna, the start of the formal meeting of the so-called Opec+ group was delayed by over three hours as ministers huddled in private meetings attempting to find common ground.

“A deal certainly can still emerge today, but right now it appears to be hanging in the balance,” said Amrita Sen at Energy Aspects.

On one side Russia briefed that it did not want to do any more than extend the group’s existing production deal, in place since before the coronavirus outbreak, to remove 2.1m barrels a day of oil production. Saudi Arabia has indicated it could walk away from the table unless Russia agrees to participate in a further 1.5m b/d cut.

The stand-off raises the prospect of the four-year old alliance between two of the world’s largest oil producers weakening at a time when oil demand has slumped and the wider economy is being disrupted by a virus that threatens to become a global pandemic.

The oil industry is bracing for demand to potentially shrink in 2020 for the first time since the financial crisis and a breakdown in the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Russia would threaten even lower prices, which have already fallen by a third to below $50 a barrel since January.

Jamie Webster, an analyst at Boston Consulting Group’s Center for Energy Impact, said that if Opec and its allies did not announce a substantial cut then prices could fall to lows last seen in early 2016, when crude traded near $30 a barrel.

“They have to act decisively or prices are going to sink,” Mr Webster said.

On Thursday Opec’s core members, not including Russia or other producers who have only allied with the group since 2016, first announced their plan to cut 1.5m b/d if joined by their partners. In a sign of how concerned they are by oil’s slide, they put out a statement late in the evening following additional discussions saying they wanted the deep cuts to last for the entire year, rather than just until the summer.

But as Russian energy minister Alexander Novak arrived back in the Austrian capital on Friday morning for meetings at the Opec secretariat, it became clear Russia was not on board. TASS, the Russian news service, reported the Russian delegation had rejected the plan before talks even commenced.

Saudi Arabian energy minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, the half brother of the de facto ruler of the kingdom, Mohammed bin Salman, is leading the Opec side in its push to get an agreement on the cuts.

But there are signs the kingdom may be prepared to walk away from the deal, believing the resultant drop in oil prices may eventually force a stronger agreement, while also hurting high-cost rivals like shale oil producers in the US.

“Saudi is willing to entertain a ‘what-if’ scenario in that if Russia doesn’t comply with incremental cuts the silver lining is a ‘reap what you sow’ moment for the oil market,” said Christyan Malek at JP Morgan. “Shale effectively shuts down and inventories fall.”

Russia too has indicated it can live with a lower oil price for a period and can see the benefit in squeezing shale producers, who have captured much of global oil demand growth for the past decade but are already struggling to make a profit.

With investors in the US increasingly wary of funding shale’s expansion, many in the market think now might be the time for countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia to put the sector under pressure by letting prices fall, though this tactic failed in 2014.

Analysts warn it would also be a very risky exercise given the impact of the coronavirus on the world economy.

Energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie estimates oil demand fell by as much as 2.7m b/d in the first quarter, or almost 3 per cent, with China — the world’s second-largest oil consumer after the US — seeing a sharp drop in economic activity as Beijing tried to curtail the spread of the virus.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, fell as much as 5 per cent on Friday to a low of $47.02 a barrel, its lowest since 2017, while US benchmark West Texas Intermediate hit a low of $43.17 a barrel.

Shares in the largest listed European oil and gas majors fell sharply, with BP and Royal Dutch Shell both down more than 4 per cent on the day. They have lost more than a fifth of their market capitalisation since mid-January.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzEwZjNlOWQyLTVmOTQtMTFlYS04MDMzLWZhNDBhMGQ2NWE5ONIBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzEwZjNlOWQyLTVmOTQtMTFlYS04MDMzLWZhNDBhMGQ2NWE5OA?oc=5

2020-03-06 13:50:00Z
52780639491845

Job growth smashes expectations for February as unemployment falls back to 3.5% - CNBC

A General Motors assembly worker moves a V6 engine, used in a variety of GM cars, trucks and crossovers, from the final assembly line at the GM Romulus Powertrain plant in Romulus, Michigan, August 21, 2019.

Rebecca Cook | Reuters

Nonfarm payrolls grew far more than expected in February as companies continued to hire amid a growing coronavirus scare.

The Labor Department reported Friday that the U.S. economy added 273,000 new jobs during the month, while the unemployment rate was 3.5%, matching its lowest level in more than 50 years. An alternative measure of joblessness that counts those not looking for work and holding part-time jobs for economic reasons edged higher to 7%.

Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been looking for payroll growth of 175,000 and a 3.5% jobless level. Average hourly earnings grew by 3% over the past year, in line with estimates, while the average work week, considered a key measure of productivity, nudge up to 34.4 hours.

There was more good news for the jobs market: the previous two months' estimates were revised higher by a total of 85,000. December moved up from 147,000 to 184,000, while January went from 225,000 to 273,000. Those revisions brought the three-month average up to a robust 243,000 while the average monthly gain in 2019 was 178,000.

Despite the strong numbers, Wall Street was heading for more losses Friday though futures were off their bottom after the report.

"This could be the last perfect employment report the market gets for some time," said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Union Bank.

Gains were spread across a multitude of sectors as the total employment level hit 158.8 million, near its December 2019 record.

Health care and social assistance led the way in job creation with 57,000 new positions. Food services and drinking places both added 53,000 while government employment grew by 45,000 due to Census hiring and state government education. Construction added 42,000 thanks to continued mild weather, while professional and technical services contributed 32,000 and finance rose by 26,000, part of a 160,000 gain over the past 12 months.

In the survey of households, employment rose by 126,00 while the ranks of the unemployed decreased by 105,000. 

"While it's too early to see the impact of the coronavirus on the labor market, we can say the labor market was in a good place before the virus began to spread," said Nick Bunker, economic research director at job placement firm Indeed. "But the next few months will be a test of just how resilient this labor market is."

Jobs market still looks strong

The jobs numbers took on particular importance in February as worries intensified over the economic impact from the novel coronavirus, though the report covered the time frame before worries over the disease's spread intensified.

Most of the indicators thus far have shown little damage. Jobless claims remain well within their recent trend, coming in at 216,000 in the latest reading Thursday. Job placement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas also reported Thursday that planned layoffs actually fell 16% from January. And key ISM readings on both manufacturing and services show companies still plan to hire.

"Now more than ever, we need to focus on the labor market data," said Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab. "The consumer has kind of kept things afloat."

Most of the consumer-related data points have been good, though the reports coming in now largely cover the early stages of the coronavirus scare and the sharp recent stock market volatility.

With the large measure of uncertainty around the disease, its impacts may be felt in increments rather than suddenly. But if cracks begin to form, the first notices likely will come in employment data.

"If we start to handle things the way they're handled in Italy and South Korea, closing schools and having mandated cancellations of travel and sporting events, I think there's no way we don't start to see it in the labor market and in consumer confidence and spending," Sonders said.

Get the market reaction here.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiQWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuYmMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDMvMDYvdXMtam9icy1yZXBvcnQtZmVicnVhcnktMjAyMC5odG1s0gFFaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY25iYy5jb20vYW1wLzIwMjAvMDMvMDYvdXMtam9icy1yZXBvcnQtZmVicnVhcnktMjAyMC5odG1s?oc=5

2020-03-06 13:30:00Z
52780649666741