Minggu, 27 Oktober 2019

A scam targeting Americans over the phone has resulted in millions of dollars lost to hackers. Don't be the next victim. - CNN

The woman was a scammer, and Gunst was just the latest target in a growing trend that's left thousands of Americans frustrated, broke, and without a clue how to get their money back.
In the last 10 months, 140 local governments, police stations and hospitals have been held hostage by ransomware attacks
The over-the-phone scheme is a type of phishing scam.
And in the last year, a whopping 26,379 people reported being a victim of some sort of phishing scam. Together they reported nearly $50 million in losses, according to the FBI's 2018 Internet Crime Report.
While the number of reported scams increased slightly from the 25,344 phishing scams reported to the FBI in 2017, the losses skyrocketed by nearly $20 million.
They are not going away anytime soon, as scammers are getting more clever and devious in their phishing attempts. Here's how you can avoid being the next person to fall for one.

How it works

Gunst ignored the first call from the scammer -- he didn't recognize the number. But the same number called him again, and as a business owner accustomed to unknown numbers, he decided to pick up.
Gunst says the woman on the other end claimed she worked with the bank, and someone had attempted to use his card in Miami. Gunst, who lives in San Francisco, told the caller it wasn't him.
Still, having received legitimate calls from his bank regarding attempted fraud in the past, Gunst still did not suspect anything unusual.
Virtual kidnappings are rattling families across the US
Then it got weird.
After confirming that he did not use his card in Miami, Gunst says the caller told him that the transaction had been blocked, and then asked him for his member number.
Gunst then received a legitimate verification pin from the bank's regular number via text, which he promptly read back to the caller -- not realizing that it was a password reset code.
The person on the line -- a scammer -- was in. She could access his account and began to read off recent transactions that Gunst had actually made, lending a bit more credibility to the call.
Then came the next question, which immediately set off a red flag: "We now want to block the pin on your account, so you get a fraud alert when it is used again. What is your pin?"
Gunst hung up. That's a number no bank would ever ask for. He quickly called the fraud department at his bank, and began to rethink how the call went awry.
"The problem is the text should say what its purpose is," Gunst later explained to CNN of the verification pin, which he tweeted about in a widely-read thread. "'Someone is trying to reset your password. Don't give this number to everyone.' But it didn't. It was just a generic pin."
He said that was a lesson for the bank to learn from.

The 'hack' used social engineering

We asked a hacker to try and steal a CNN tech reporter's data. Here's what happened
Hackers may use what's known as social engineering to try and obtain or compromise information about you, which could then be used to gain access to something such as your bank account.
What that means is simple: they tricked you, or someone who knows you, to compromise your account.
CNN reporter Donie O'Sullivan recently agreed to allow Rachel Tobac, a cybersecurity executive and hacker who specializes in social engineering, to hack him as a means to show how a scam can work. She was able to get his home address, phone number, have his hotel points transferred over to her and even change his seat on an upcoming flight.
And she was able to do this largely by using information that he posted online on social media: an Instagram check-in at a hotel and a tweet about a piece of furniture.
How? Both the hotel and the furniture company handed his personal details to the hacker over the phone.

It's not always your fault

Companies that don't have the proper security procedures in place can often leave themselves and their customers vulnerable to a social engineering attack.
A small company could easily be tricked into giving up personal customer information over the phone if a clever hacker has just enough information to seem credible.
Small banks and companies have been known to put out member newsletters or even hold member appreciation events where it's posted on social media and people are invited to accept or decline the invitation, according to Ron Schlecht, managing partner of security firm BTB Security.
A savvy hacker could've used that information to find members of that bank and use social engineering to find information such as their home addresses and phone numbers in order to phish them.
"It's unclear at this point where this happened, but there's no doubt in my mind that they knew that I was a customer of that bank and they thoroughly understood the security procedures of that bank," Gunst says. "It was rather targeted."
While it's possible that Gunst's bank was compromised, Schlecht says that "it's more likely that they disclosed information without really knowing it was bad to do so."

Spotting the scam

There are a number of clues out there that should raise your suspicions.
"If you've been randomly selected for a big prize, vacation, or to enjoy great savings or if all of a sudden the IRS, Medicare, or Social Security Administration needs to get a hold of you for a warrant or penalty, take a deep breath and consider the legitimacy of the call," Schlecht said.
He offered a simple rule: "Very broadly, if something seems too good to be true or too bad to be true, it probably is. Chances are that you haven't entered into a drawing, specifically sought out services, or even have an idea that you've done some misdeed."
Phishing scams are common, but particularly clever phishing attempts can deceive even those who are aware of them.
Yet another company has been hit by a ransomware attack
In the moment, with the scammer on the other end putting pressure on you to verify or give up information, it's easy to make a mistake or overlook a detail or clue that may hint at a scam.
Knowing the procedures your bank or institution takes with fraud attempts can be helpful in spotting a scam, but it's not foolproof. Gunst has received multiple calls from his bank for real fraud attempts in the past, and he says that the scammer stuck to the pattern very closely. He said it was a "very clever trick."
"When I read that thread now, that's one red flag after another," Gunst says. "But it's hard to express the social engineering component of it. My guard wasn't up in the way it should've been."
The FBI warned of scammers spoofing legitimate FBI phone numbers in August, so it's clear that you truly can't trust any inbound call no matter what the caller ID says. Your best bet at staying safe would be to hang up and to call the phone number your bank or institution has listed.
"Zero trust always wins," Schlecht said. "You can't verify that they are who they say they are, so call them after the notification instead of interacting with an inbound call."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/27/business/phishing-bank-scam-trnd/index.html

2019-10-27 09:22:00Z
CAIiEB9Pel4uoS4c5GxIE5Uf5tMqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowocv1CjCSptoCMPrTpgU

Sabtu, 26 Oktober 2019

Microsoft's JEDI win called a gamechanger - Seeking Alpha

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Microsoft's JEDI win called a gamechanger  Seeking Alpha
  2. Microsoft Wins Pentagon’s $10 Billion JEDI Contract, Thwarting Amazon  The New York Times
  3. Microsoft snags hotly contested $10 billion defense contract, beating out Amazon  CNBC
  4. Microsoft pips Amazon for $10bn AI 'Jedi' contract  BBC News
  5. Microsoft Wins $10 Billion Pentagon JEDI Cloud Contract, Beating Amazon  Investor's Business Daily
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3509869-microsofts-jedi-win-called-gamechanger

2019-10-26 13:13:00Z
52780418483639

Flight attendant sues Southwest Airlines over hidden bathroom cam - Fox Business

A flight attendant is suing Southwest Airlines for retaliation after she reported two pilots for livestreaming bathroom video to their cockpit.

According to a lawsuit first reported by the Arizona Republic, when Renee Steinaker was working a flight between Phoenix and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Capt. Terry Graham asked her to cover for him in the cockpit while he used the restroom.

Continue Reading Below

At least two authorized people are required to be in the cockpit at all times.

When Graham went to the restroom, Steinaker claims an iPad mounted to the windshield showed a livestream from the lavatory.

The lawsuit claims the co-pilot, Ryan Russell, panicked when she asked about the camera, and claimed they were part of new top-secret security measures implemented by the airline.

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES EMPLOYEES COULD LAND BOEING 737 REIMBURSEMENT

Not believing her coworker, Steinaker took a photo of the iPad with her cellphone. Though crewmembers reported the pair of pilots, both reportedly still fly with the airline today, according to the lawsuit. Steinaker claims she was told to not speak of the incident further.  The lawsuit claims Steinaker and her husband, also a flight attendant, were stalked, monitored by managers in a "threatening and bizarre manner" and subjected to an increased number of performance audits afterward.

Southwest Airlines emailed a statement to the newspaper, noting that the carrier does not use cameras in washrooms.

“The safety and security of our employees and customers is Southwest’s uncompromising priority," the airline said. "At this time, we have no other comment on the pending litigation.”

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Attorneys for the pilots haven't yet responded to requests for comment, though court documents show they deny the allegations.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/flight-attendant-sues-southwest-airlines-over-hidden-bathroom-cam

2019-10-26 12:22:32Z
52780419357142

Microsoft Beats out Amazon for Pentagon's $10 Billion Cloud Computing Contract - Gizmodo

Photo: Pool (Getty)

The Pentagon’s $10 billion deal to provide cloud computing services to the Department of Defense officially went to Microsoft Friday. The news came as an upset to Amazon, whose competing bid appeared to be the frontrunner for most of the contract’s deliberations. Throughout the yearlong process, President Donald Trump has repeatedly rebuked Amazon’s prospects, which seems in part an extenuation of his outspoken vendetta against the company and its CEO, Jeff Bezos.

According to a Washington Post report, Microsoft is now set to take over the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) project, a potentially decade-long federal cloud computing initiative that has attracted interest from some of the biggest names in tech. In addition to Microsoft and Amazon, Oracle and Google also went after the massive contract. The latter dropped out of the running last year after extensive protests made it very clear Google employees were not happy about the prospect of working for the U.S. military.

Advertisement

Though both Microsoft and Amazon were finalists for the contract, the choice seemed fairly obvious. Amazon Web Services both holds a larger market share when it comes to cloud computing—48 percent compared to Microsoft’s 15.5 percent according to the market-research firm Gartner—and has secured a higher data management certification from the military than Microsoft, the Post reported.

However, while the project remained unfinalized in July, a flowchart created by Oracle detailing an elaborate “conspiracy” at play to secure Amazon the contract somehow found its way to Trump’s desk, prompting the president to order an investigation into possible foul play. Internal inquiries found no evidence of the subterfuge Oracle described, CNN reported at the time.

But that didn’t stop Trump retweeting coverage from Fox News that nicknamed the contract the “Bezos bailout” along with other apparent displays of partiality. He frequently criticizes the Bezos-owned Washington Post as “fake news” for its less than flattering coverage of the White House as well as Bezos himself and Amazon by extension. Technically, federal acquisition laws should prevent politicians from putting their thumb on the scales in these matters. At least, they did back when Washington wasn’t constantly on fire. Who knows, these days.

All of these rebukes could be ammo for possible litigation should Amazon choose to push back against the Pentagon’s decision. An attorney with the law firm McCarter & English, Franklin Turner, told the Post:

“It’s crystal clear here that the President of the United States did not want this contract to be awarded to one of the competitors. As a result its fairly likely that we will see a number of challenges that the procurement was not conducted on a level playing field.”

Advertisement

In an announcement for the award, the Defense Department described it as a by-the-book decision, the Post reported. “The acquisition process was conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.” Furthermore, all parties “were treated fairly and evaluated consistently with the solicitation’s stated evaluation criteria.”

Yeah, something tells me Amazon’s not going to see it that way.

[The Washington Post]

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://gizmodo.com/microsoft-beats-out-amazon-for-pentagons-10-billion-cl-1839372258

2019-10-26 05:52:00Z
52780418483639

Jumat, 25 Oktober 2019

Pentagon awards Microsoft $10B 'war cloud' contract, snubbing Amazon - Fox News

The Pentagon announced Friday that it awarded a $10 billion Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) contract to build a cloud-computing system for the military to Microsoft, in a noteworthy snub to Amazon.

The Pentagon initially considered Microsoft, Amazon, IBM and Oracle in the contentious bidding process to build the so-called “War Cloud.” Oracle and IBM were cut from consideration early on due to security and infrastructure concerns; Oracle claimed the process was rigged to benefit Amazon.

“This contract will address critical and urgent unmet warfighter requirements for modern cloud infrastructure at all three classification levels delivered out to the tactical edge,” the Pentagon said in a statement, stressing that the process was fair and followed procedural guidelines.

ARMY AI TASK FORCE WORKS TO MASSIVELY 'SPEED UP' WEAPONS ATTACKS

The contract was originally set to be awarded Aug. 23, but the Trump administration pushed back the deadline to ensure fairness.

Trump had raised concerns that there may be a conflict of interest in relation to Amazon.

"I’m getting tremendous complaints about the contract with the Pentagon and with Amazon,” he had said. "They’re saying it wasn’t competitively bid. I have had very few things where there’s been such complaining."

He threatened to intervene and in August, the Pentagon halted the process to review it for transparency.

JEFF BEZOS TO BE NO. 2 RICHEST, BEHIND BILL GATES, AFTER AMAZON STOCK DROP

It was alleged that only Amazon could have won the contract based on how it was structured. Amazon, owned by Jeff Bezos, already has a high-security cloud contract with the CIA.

While the Pentagon ultimately went with Microsoft for the 10-year contract, Microsoft’s work can be reassessed after two years and the government has the option to pull out of the contract.

The Pentagon currently relies on dated computer systems to communicate information, and it said that additional contracting opportunities are anticipated.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/tech/pentagon-microsoft-cloud-deal-amazon

2019-10-26 01:01:26Z
52780418483639

Tesla chair on CEO Elon Musk's promises: Setting 'audacious goals' drives success - CNBC

Tesla CEO Elon Musk's "audacious goals" have helped drive the company's success, Chairwoman Robyn Denholm said Friday.

"To achieve what Tesla has achieved over the last five years, over the last 10 years, you have to set audacious goals and big goals ... and then have everybody in the company work like crazy to get there," she said in an interview on CNBC's "Squawk Box."

Tesla, for instance, completed its new factory in Shanghai in 10 months and recently hit 97,000 vehicles a quarter, Denholm cited as examples of the Musk's "audacious goals." She replaced Musk as chair in November.

"I think part of it is setting those very big goals so that the company can rally and get behind them and move forward, and move the whole industry forward," she said.

Denholm's remarks come two days after the company reported a surprise third-quarter profit and told shareholders it is ahead of schedule with the new factory in Shanghai, which has started trial production of its Model 3.

"There is a huge opportunity for growth in China," she said, adding Tesla is taking lessons it learned from launching production and vehicles in the U.S. to China.

Tesla's shares spiked more than 20% after hours Wednesday. The stock closed Thursday at $299.68, a 17.67% increase. Analysts had expected a quarterly loss. Revenue basically matched forecasts. The company also said it was ahead of schedule on its long-awaited Model Y crossover.

Baron Capital founder Ron Baron, who appeared on "Squawk Box" with Denholm, said although Musk often takes the center of attention, Tesla's entire team is driving the company to hit its goals.

"They have 42,000 employees. This is not reliant upon one man," he said from the sidelines of his annual investment conference in New York City. "But he has empowered people to be able to make decisions and to be able to do what's best for the company."

Baron Funds currently owns more than 1.62 million shares, worth nearly $488 million based on Thursday's close of $299.68 per share. The buy-and-hold billionaire's average cost of acquiring Tesla shares over the years, starting in 2012, stands at $218.75 each.

Thursday's surge squeezed Tesla's short sellers, traders betting the stock would go lower, to the tune of an estimated $1.4 billion in losses, according to S3 Analytics. Tesla is the most heavily shorted stock in the U.S., and the most heavily shorted automaker in the world. Those who short a stock borrow shares in hopes of buying them back in the future at a profit after the stock drops.

Tesla's shares have been on a wild ride since nearing all-time highs in August 2018. It's been more than a year since Musk tweeted he had "funding secured" to take the company private at $420 per share — plans abandoned weeks later. However, the now-infamous tweet on Aug. 7, 2018 led to a Securities and Exchange Commission probe on accusations of "false and misleading" statements. Musk and Tesla reached a settlement with the SEC in September 2018, which required, in part, Musk to relinquish his role as chairman of the board.

Ark Investment Management founder and CEO Catherine Wood told CNBC that Thursday's surge in Tesla stock is just the beginning of an eventual rise to $4,000 per share and possibly beyond.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/25/tesla-chairman-on-musk-promises-audacious-goals-drive-success.html

2019-10-25 12:24:54Z
CAIiECMuFEg5r_qlLeANa1VURFYqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow2Nb3CjDivdcCMJ_d7gU

Tesla starts selling made-in-China Model 3 with Autopilot for ~$50,000 - Electrek

Tesla has updated the Model 3 online configurator in China to start selling the made-in-China Model 3 Standard Range Plus with Autopilot for ~$50,000.

There’s been a lot of talk about when Tesla is actually going to start Model 3 production at Gigafctory 3 in Shanghai.

On Wednesday, the automaker confirmed that trial production of Model 3 in Shanghai has begun, but they still need to meet some more “governmental requirements”:

“We have cleared initial milestones toward our manufacturing license and are working toward finalizing the license and meeting other governmental requirements before we begin ramping production and delivery of vehicles from Shanghai.”

On Friday, Tesla updated its Model 3 online configurator for the Chinese market and it now includes the Model 3 Standard Range Plus with Autopilot as the new base option, like in other markets, however, Tesla specifies that this model is made in China:

The automaker also still notes that availability is subject to regulatory approval and delivery is not expected before the first quarter of 2020.

However, Tesla has been taking reservations with a version of the car without Autopilot over the past 6 months – meaning that it likely has a backlog to work through between now and next year.

The Model 3 Standard Range Plus with Autopilot starts at ¥355,800, which is equivalent to about $50,000.

Tesla has been promoting the vehicle today on its Chinese social media accounts (via Weibo):

That’s only about 3% less expensive than what buyers were paying for the Model 3 imported to the US, but they could get access to different incentives.

Now Tesla offers the same lineup of Model 3 in China as it does in other markets with the only difference being that the base version is made at Gigafactory 3 and the more expensive all-wheel-drive versions of the car are still made in the US.

It’s unclear how many cars Tesla plans to deliver from Gigafactory 3 this year, but the automaker aims to ramp up production to 1,000 units per week by the end of the year and quickly ramp up to 3,000 units per week next year.

Electrek’s Take

Yes, it is not a big difference in price with the imported version, but that’s not what matters.

What matters is that it is about the same price as a BMW 3 Series in China before gas savings and EV incentives.

With advantages like easier access to license plates, the made-in-China Model 3 could make a good dent in the premium sedan segment and accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles in what is already the biggest market for EVs.

We will keep a close eye over the next few weeks on how well the ‘made-in-China’ Model 3 is received in the country.


Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://electrek.co/2019/10/25/tesla-starts-selling-made-in-china-model-3-with-autopilot/

2019-10-25 11:13:00Z
52780416991787