Sabtu, 20 Juli 2019

Was the Fed's December interest rate hike a mistake? - Fox Business

President Trump has repeated the claim again and again: The Federal Reserve made a mistake by raising interest rates in December, the fourth time that policymakers at the U.S. central bank did so last year.

Continue Reading Below

The Fed’s dovish pivot over the past few months seemed to lend credence to that argument; for a usually slow-moving regulatory body, Chairman Jerome Powell’s signaling during his testimony on Capitol Hill last week that the central bank will lower the benchmark federal funds rate at the end of July seemed to represent a fairly dynamic shift.

Plus, during a speech in Paris on Tuesday, Powell continued to pave the way for a rate cut in a few weeks, laying out the case for easier monetary policy as uncertainties continue to weigh on the global economy.

MORE FROM FOXBUSINESS.COM...

Economic analysts, however, say that while the Fed’s shift does mark a sudden turn of events, it’s not the first time the central bank has reversed monetary policy so quickly. (Historical data shows that policymakers have cut rates with the S&P 500 at an all-time high seven times – the last time in 1996).

“I don’t know if I would characterize it as a mistake,” said Ken Moraif, CFP and senior adviser at the Retirement Planners of America. “I would say that the Federal Reserve is more often than not a follower, not a leader.”

Basically, Moraif said, the Fed listens to the bond market. And right now, the bond market is flashing a dire signal that monetary policy is too tight at the current interbank lending rate between 2.25 percent to 2.5 percent. That’s because the yield curve has been inverted for almost eight weeks and historically, every time the yield curve inverts, a recession follows.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

The bond markets’ sudden warning to the Fed though – that interest rates are too high – doesn’t necessarily mean that policymakers acted too quickly in raising rates at the end of 2018. In fact, the 10-year Treasury peaked in December, an indication that a rate hike was needed.

“The bond market, which leads the Fed, in my opinion, told the Fed to raise interest rates, so they did,” he said. “And now, interest rates are down around 2 percent and that’s a significant drop, the bond market is basically telling the Fed to lower interest rates, and the Fed will likely acquiesce.”

Plus, despite relatively strong economic data, there are a number of “unusual uncertainties” on the horizon that are weighing on the outlook, said Josh Wright, the chief economist at iCIMS and a former Fed staffer. Those potential risks include: the year-long U.S.-China trade war (negotiations seem poised to hit a rut with the addition of a hardline member to Beijing’s negotiation team this week), a looming budget crisis on Capitol Hill and concerns about softening global growth.

“You string those together and suddenly the whole case on the economic data side has really eroded,” he said.

Of course, while some of those issues were present during the Fed’s December policy-setting meeting, Wright noted that there was a “lot more optimism” at the end of the year, particularly regarding hopes for a trade deal between the world’s two largest economies.

Still, Trump has continued to hammer away at the Fed, and its chairman – which is rare for a sitting president – blaming it for swings in the stock market. On multiple occasions, the president has expressed his desire to terminate Powell over raising interest rates

At the end of the year, on the heels of the Fed’s rate hike (and its guidance that it expected to raise interest rates twice more in 2019) all three major indexes posted their worst December since 1931.

“It’s more than just Jay Powell – we have people on the Fed that really weren’t – they’re not my people,” the president told CNBC in June. “But they certainly didn’t listen to me because they made a big mistake: They raised interest rates far too fast.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/was-the-feds-december-interest-rate-hike-a-mistake

2019-07-20 15:09:30Z
52780335075090

Start of NFL season looms over DirecTV’s negotiations with networks - NBCSports.com

Getty Images

DirecTV customers in several major markets woke up this morning to find out that they can no longer watch CBS, a development that could have a major impact on the NFL when the season starts in seven weeks.

The CBS affiliates in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, Dallas, San Francisco, Boston, Atlanta, Tampa, Seattle, Detroit, Minneapolis, Miami, Denver, Sacramento, Pittsburgh and Baltimore are all currently dark for DirecTV customers. An on-screen message from DirecTV reads, “CBS has removed this channel from your lineup despite our request to keep it available to you. We share your frustration and regret any inconvenience.”

But while that message puts the blame squarely on CBS, many football fans will respond by canceling DirecTV if they think they’ll miss out on NFL and SEC games in the fall. As noted by MultichannelNews.com, the start of the football season will put added pressure on both sides to come to a deal. Six years ago a similar fight between CBS and Time Warner Cable stoked fears that CBS would stay dark during football season, but a deal was reached at the last minute.

DirecTV viewers have also lost access to ABC, NBC and FOX in some markets, although those are mostly smaller markets than the markets that have lost their CBS affiliates. With DirecTV still having a monopoly over NFL Sunday Ticket, many of the country’s biggest football fans are DirecTV subscribers. But those fans may find that they can’t watch their local teams if nothing changes before the season starts.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/07/20/start-of-nfl-season-looms-over-directvs-negotiations-with-networks/

2019-07-20 14:18:00Z
52780335869663

CBS Sports Network & The Smithsonian Channel Have Been Removed From DIRECTV, DIRECTV NOW, & U-verse TV - Cord Cutters News, LLC

Latin woman looking disappointed at her laptopscreen, sitting behind her desk at the office.Earlier today CBS removed their 14 owned CBS locals from DIRECTV, DIRECTV NOW, and U-verse TV. Now CBS Sports Network and the Smithsonian Channel has also been removed from AT&T’s owned DIRECTV service.

Here is the statement AT&T sent Cord Cutters News about the CBS blackout:

CBS has put our customers into the middle of its negotiations by pulling its local CBS stations in 14 cities. We were willing to continue to negotiate and also offered to pay CBS an unprecedented rate increase. That increase would present CBS the highest fee we currently pay to any major broadcast network group, despite the fact that CBS stations are available free over the air.

We had hoped to avoid any unnecessary interruption to any CBS-owned stations or national channels that some of our customers care about. But CBS refused.

CBS is a repeat blackout offender and has removed these same stations from DISH Network and Charter Spectrum customers in the past and threatened to remove them from others to ensure much higher fees. CBS continues to demand unprecedented increases even as CBS advances content on CBS All Access instead of on its local broadcast stations. CBS has said publicly that it priced All Access much higher to capitalize on customers it can capture from cable, satellite or other means of distribution.

In short, CBS is seeking to convert a free, publicly subsidized broadcast station into a high-cost channel while leaving cable and satellite customers holding the bag.

Make no mistake. We want the CBS owned-and-operated local broadcast stations in our lineup. Yet customers today are demanding more choice and value from their local stations. Instead, it has become clear to us that CBS is intent on blacking out any home that chooses to receive cable or satellite service, antagonizing its most loyal viewers.

CBS and other broadcasters continue to cause blackouts at a record pace with more than 213 so far this year, tying the prior record set in 2017.

The vast majority of our TV homes in thousands of different cities will continue to receive their local CBS station the same as before. For those customers who do not, CBS shows also remain available in many affected cities through the new Locast app on DIRECTV Genie and U-verse internet-connected receivers. We are also able to offer our customers an innovative product called Local Channel Connector that can put local broadcast station signals into the program guides of many DIRECTV customers with Genie receivers. Both of these options could be helpful for football fans if CBS’ removal carries on into the college and pro seasons.

Fans of any of the 14 CBS local stations involved can also watch over the air and typically at the station website, at CBS.com or using the CBS app. CBS Sports Network and Smithsonian Channel stream their shows via their own network websites and mobile apps.

There are ways to try to permanently eliminate these blackouts, including new legislation, and fortunately Congress has taken more interest. But the best option is to create mutually beneficial relationships with broadcasters like CBS through good faith negotiations.

Our goal is simple: to deliver the content our customers want at a value that also makes sense to them. We continue to fight for that here and appreciate our customers’ patience.

Did you know we have a YouTube Channel? Every week we have a live Cord Cutting Q&A, and weekly Cord Cutting recap shows exclusively on our YouTube Channel!

Please follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more news, tips, and reviews. Need cord cutting tech support? Join our Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cordcuttersnews.com/cbs-sports-network-the-smithsonian-channel-have-been-removed-from-directv-directv-now-u-verse-tv/

2019-07-20 12:52:00Z
52780335869663

Carlos Ghosn sues Nissan-Mitsubishi in the Netherlands: paper - Reuters

FILE PHOTO: Former Nissan Motor Chariman Carlos Ghosn leaves the Tokyo Detention House in Tokyo, Japan April 25, 2019. REUTERS/Issei Kato

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - Carlos Ghosn has launched a court case in the Netherlands against Japanese carmakers Nissan Motor (7201.T) and Mitsubishi Motors (7211.T), who ousted him as chairman of their alliance last year on charges of embezzlement, Dutch newspaper NRC reported on Saturday.

Ghosn is seeking 15 million euros ($16.8 million) in damages from the carmakers, as grave mistakes were made when he was sacked, NRC reported, citing his lawyer.

“In the Netherlands, if you want to fire an executive you have to first tell him what he’s being accused of, and you have to provide him with the evidence for the accusations. Neither of those things has happened,” lawyer Laurens de Graaf told NRC.

Ghosn fell from grace late last year when he was arrested in Japan and sacked by Nissan on charges of financial misconduct, which he denies. He has also been fired as the CEO and chairman of French carmaker Renault (RENA.PA).

Ghosn was freed in April from jail in Japan on a $4.5 million bail.

Among other charges of fraud and misconduct, Nissan and Mitsubishi have said Ghosn improperly received $9 million in compensation from their joint venture.

Suspect expenses Ghosn made when he chaired Renault and Nissan amounted to about 11 million euros, Renault’s board said in June.

Ghosn holds French, Lebanese and Brazilian citizenship, but opted for the fiscally more friendly Netherlands as his tax domicile in 2012. The holding company for the Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance is also incorporated in the Netherlands.

The district court in Amsterdam is reviewing the case but has not set a trial date yet, NRC said.

Reporting by Bart Meijer; Editing by Gareth Jones

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-renault-nissan-ghosn/carlos-ghosn-sues-nissan-mitsubishi-in-the-netherlands-paper-idUSKCN1UF063

2019-07-20 08:10:00Z
CBMiggFodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL3VzLXJlbmF1bHQtbmlzc2FuLWdob3NuL2Nhcmxvcy1naG9zbi1zdWVzLW5pc3Nhbi1taXRzdWJpc2hpLWluLXRoZS1uZXRoZXJsYW5kcy1wYXBlci1pZFVTS0NOMVVGMDYz0gE0aHR0cHM6Ly9tb2JpbGUucmV1dGVycy5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9hbXAvaWRVU0tDTjFVRjA2Mw

AT&T drops CBS channels from its cable systems - Reuters

FILE PHOTO: An AT&T logo is pictured in Pasadena, California, U.S., January 24, 2018. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

(Reuters) - CBS Corp (CBS.N) and AT&T Inc (T.N) failed to renew their contact, resulting in millions of DirecTV subscribers losing access to CBS programming.

CBS television stations in over a dozen U.S. cities, including New York and Los Angeles, went dark for DirecTV customers effective 0200 ET (0600 GMT), CBS said in a statement on Saturday.

“While we continue to negotiate in good faith and hope that AT&T agrees to fair terms soon, this loss of CBS programming could last a long time,” CBS added, as the companies blamed one another for the deal’s collapse.

CBS, the network with hit shows like “NCIS” and “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” is directing customers to a website called “KeepCBS.com”, where they are urged to mail, call or post messages onto DirecTV’s social media pages.

In a separate statement AT&T said that they “were willing to continue to negotiate and also offered to pay CBS an unprecedented rate increase.”

In March, AT&T renewed its contract with Viacom Inc (VIAB.O) avoiding a blackout of MTV, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central for users of the telecom carrier’s pay TV service DirecTV.

CBS had informed its users on Tuesday that they should be prepared for a blackout from June 19, unless an agreement was reached with AT&T.

Reporting by Maria Ponnezhath in Bengaluru; Editing by Stephen Powell

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-at-t-cbs/att-drops-cbs-channels-from-its-cable-systems-idUSKCN1UF04G

2019-07-20 07:26:00Z
52780335869663

Jumat, 19 Juli 2019

Trump wades into debate over controversial Fed speech Thursday, calls for end to tight policy - CNBC

President Donald Trump weighed into a simmering debate over the Federal Reserve interest rate policy, saying Friday that the central bank needs to end its "crazy" tightening moves.

In a series of tweets, the president addressed an unusual controversy stemming from a speech Thursday that New York Fed President John Williams delivered.

Market participants initially took Williams' remarks as indicative that the central bank was prepared to cut rates aggressively, by perhaps a half a percentage point. But a Fed spokesman soon walked back the comments, causing confusion over where policy is headed.

Trump said he liked Williams' "first statement much better than his second." He called on the Fed to "stop with the crazy quantitative tightening" and not to "blow it" by halting "unparalleled" growth.

The president, though, mischaracterized Williams' comments. Williams never said in the speech that the Fed raised "far too fast & too early," as Trump suggested. Rather, Williams said the Fed, when confronted with an economic downturn and interest rates close to zero, should cut quickly and aggressively.

Trump has long been a Fed critic, saying the central bank's rate hikes since December 2015, along with its efforts to reduce bond holdings on its balance sheet, i.e. "quantitative tightening," have constrained economic growth. The Fed already has announced plans to halt the balance sheet rolloff, likely in September.

With fears building over a bevy of issues including global economic slowdown, tariffs, Brexit, debt ceiling negotiations and a vexing lack of inflationary pressures, markets widely expect the Fed to announce a rate cut at its July 30-31 meeting.

In his speech, Williams said that when faced with "economic distress," the Fed should "act quickly" and "keep interest rates lower for longer." Coming along with similarly dovish comments from Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, markets immediately started pricing in an even sharper reduction from the Fed than the typical quarter-point moves and looked for a possible half-point cut.

Williams' office, however, followed with a statement saying that his comments were only in regard to an academic study and shouldn't be construed as a current policy intention.

Traders on Friday were assigning a 41% chance of a half-point cut, according to the CME's FedWatch tracker.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/19/trump-wades-into-debate-over-controversial-fed-speech-thursday-calls-for-end-to-tight-policy.html

2019-07-19 14:41:36Z
52780335075090

Trump wades into debate over controversial Fed speech Thursday, calls for end to tight policy - CNBC

President Donald Trump weighed into a simmering debate over the Federal Reserve interest rate policy, saying Friday that the central bank needs to end its "crazy" tightening moves.

In a series of tweets, the president addressed an unusual controversy stemming from a speech Thursday that New York Fed President John Williams delivered.

Market participants initially took Williams' remarks as indicative that the central bank was prepared to cut rates aggressively, by perhaps a half a percentage point. But a Fed spokesman soon walked back the comments, causing confusion over where policy is headed.

Trump said he liked Williams' "first statement much better than his second." He called on the Fed to "stop with the crazy quantitative tightening" and not to "blow it" by halting "unparalleled" growth.

The president, though, mischaracterized Williams' comments. Williams never said in the speech that the Fed raised "far too fast & too early," as Trump suggested. Rather, Williams said the Fed, when confronted with an economic downturn and interest rates close to zero, should cut quickly and aggressively.

Trump has long been a Fed critic, saying the central bank's rate hikes since December 2015, along with its efforts to reduce bond holdings on its balance sheet, i.e. "quantitative tightening," have constrained economic growth. The Fed already has announced plans to halt the balance sheet rolloff, likely in September.

With fears building over a bevy of issues including global economic slowdown, tariffs, Brexit, debt ceiling negotiations and a vexing lack of inflationary pressures, markets widely expect the Fed to announce a rate cut at its July 30-31 meeting.

In his speech, Williams said that when faced with "economic distress," the Fed should "act quickly" and "keep interest rates lower for longer." Coming along with similarly dovish comments from Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, markets immediately started pricing in an even sharper reduction from the Fed than the typical quarter-point moves and looked for a possible half-point cut.

Williams' office, however, followed with a statement saying that his comments were only in regard to an academic study and shouldn't be construed as a current policy intention.

Traders on Friday were assigning a 41% chance of a half-point cut, according to the CME's FedWatch tracker.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/19/trump-wades-into-debate-over-controversial-fed-speech-thursday-calls-for-end-to-tight-policy.html

2019-07-19 14:41:17Z
52780335075090