Sabtu, 01 Juni 2019

China Targets FedEx in ‘Warning’ to U.S. - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

China Targets FedEx in ‘Warning’ to U.S.  Bloomberg

China targeted FedEx Corp. in its escalating trade war with the U.S., giving a hint of which foreign companies it may blacklist as “unreliable.” With Chinese officials due to announce their position on trade talks with the U.S. on Sunday, the investigation into FedEx’s “wrongful delivery of packages” was framed as a warning by Beijing after the Trump administration imposed a ban on business with telecom giant Huawei Technologies Co. The latest salvo signals there’s no detente in sight in the struggle between the world’s two biggest economies at a time when trade talks have broken down. Chin...


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-01/china-launches-investigation-into-fedex-xinhua

2019-06-01 14:11:14Z
CAIiEKHGrdDRBFJrw7URsyg09gkqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Trump’s stunning decision to escalate trade wars with China and Mexico signals a turning point for U.S. policy - The Washington Post

President Trump’s plan to slap new tariffs on Mexican imports, weeks after escalating his trade war with China, leaves the United States fighting a multi-front campaign that threatens more instability for manufacturers, consumers and the global economy.

The president’s bombshell announcement that he would impose 5 percent tariffs on Mexican imports, with the possibility of raising them to 25 percent if Mexico doesn’t stop migrants from crossing into the United States, left some economists fearing there were few limits to Trump’s appetite for trade conflict.

“In our view, if the U.S. is willing to impose tariff and non-tariff barriers on China and Mexico, then the bar for tariffs on other important U.S. trading partners, including Europe, may be lower than we previously thought,” Barclays economists said in a research note. “We think trade tensions could escalate further before they de-escalate,” Barclays added.

Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, called Trump’s move against Mexico a turning point for financial markets and the U.S. economy.

In global markets Friday, investors spooked by new tariff threats sought safety in German government bonds and the Euro rather than their customary dollar-denominated havens. This “seems to me an indicator that the concerns about the U.S. are rising,” Posen said.

The president’s latest move rocked business leaders who were already scrambling to reshape supply chains to avoid fallout from the U.S. confrontation with China. The added uncertainty may paralyze executives who can’t be sure their next supply chain location will be any safer than their last.

“A lot of companies feeling pressure to get out of China are looking at Mexico if they want to serve the US market, Vietnam if they’re more focused on Asia,” said William Reinsch, a former Commerce Department trade official. “Trump’s action yesterday scrambles all those plans.”

In one example of a company caught in the crossfire, GoPro of San Mateo, Calif., last month announced it would move manufacturing of some of its cameras from China to Mexico, so that it could stop paying tariffs to import them to the United States -- tariffs resulting from the U.S. trade war with China. Weeks later, GoPro now faces new tariffs to import those goods from Mexico. The company declined to comment Friday.

As U.S. companies race to find new tariff-free places to manufacture, so far few have reported returning production to the United States, despite the president’s stated aim of using trade policy to help bring jobs back home. Many are still seeking alternative locations overseas, where labor is cheaper.

Trump said he would impose the new tariffs because the Mexican government wasn’t doing enough to stem the flow of migrants, many of whom travel through Mexico from Central America. Some White House officials who support Trump’s approach believe the threat of tariffs is the only way to get the attention of Mexican leaders.

The Mexican government tried to defuse the tension Friday, saying the two sides would meet in Washington on Wednesday for high-level talks.

If no solution is found, Mexico is certain to impose retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, with likely targets including U.S. pork, beef, wheat and dairy products, said Former Mexican diplomat Jorge Guajardo.

Some prominent Republicans, including Senate Finance Chairman Charles E. Grassley , raised concerns that the new tariffs could threaten a trade agreement the Trump administration clinched only months ago with Mexico and Canada, to replace the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement.

Others said the about-face treatment of Mexico would damage Trump’s ability to negotiate trade deals it is pursuing with other partners, including China and Europe.

“You can’t negotiate a trade agreement with someone and then turn around and whack them,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a Republican economist and former Congressional Budget Office director.

In late March, Trump threatened to shut the entire southern border to curb illegal immigration, but backed down a week later after an outcry. That has left some wondering how seriously they should take the latest tariff threat.

If Trump follows through with new tariffs on Mexico, it would hurt U.S. economic growth and increase the possibility of the Federal Reserve reversing course and cutting interest rates this year, economists said.

“The drag to the US economy could be meaningful, especially if the tariffs reach 25%,” the upper limit that Trump has set, Bank of America Merrill Lynch economists wrote Friday. Even if the tariff remains at 5 percent, the effective cost could be higher because many parts cross the border several times as products are assembled, and the tariff must be paid upon each crossing into the United States.

U.S. automakers will be among the principal casualties. Last year, the United States imported roughly $350 billion in merchandise from Mexico, including about $85 billion in vehicles and parts, according to the International Trade Administration.

A full 25 percent tax “would cripple the industry and cause major uncertainty,” according to Deutsche Bank Securities.

“The auto sector – and the 10 million jobs it supports – relies upon the North American supply chain and cross border commerce to remain globally competitive,” said Dave Schwietert, interim president of the Auto Alliance, an industry group. “This is especially true with auto parts which can cross the U.S. border multiple times before final assembly.”

“Widely applied tariffs on goods from Mexico will raise the price of motor vehicle parts, cars, trucks, and commercial vehicles – and consumer goods in general -- for American consumers,” the industry group said. “The potential ripple effects of the proposed Mexican tariffs on the U.S. North American and global trade efforts could be devastating.”

Consumers could pay up to $1,300 more per vehicle if the tariffs are implemented, according to Torsten Slok, chief economist for Deutsche Bank Securities.

Retailers, technology companies and textile manufacturers also will be hurt. U.S. mills now ship yarn and fabric to Mexico, where it is turned into apparel and exported back to American retailers. Last year, the U.S. textile industry exported $4.7 billion in yarn and fabrics to Mexico, its largest single market.

“Adding tariffs to Mexican apparel imports, which largely contain U.S. textile inputs, would significantly disrupt this industry and jeopardize jobs on both sides of the border,” said Kim Glas, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations.

The new dispute with Mexico came as the U.S.-China trade conflict continued to deepen.

China on Friday announced it would establish a blacklist of “unreliable” foreign companies and organizations, effectively forcing companies around the world to choose whether they would side with Beijing or Washington.

The new “unreliable entities list” would punish organizations and individuals that harm the interests of Chinese companies, Chinese state media reported, without detailing which companies will be named in the list or what the punishment will entail.

Chinese reports suggested the Commerce Ministry will target foreign companies and groups that abandoned Chinese telecom giant Huawei after the Trump administration added Huawei to a trade blacklist this month, which prohibited the sale of U.S. technology to the Chinese company.

At a time when Western corporations have cut back executive travel to China after authorities detained two Canadians on national security grounds in December, the new blacklist sent another shock wave through the business community.

“I think foreign and especially U.S. firms now have to worry that China is creating a new ‘legal pretext’ to at least impose exit bans on foreign individuals who make this new list, if not worse,” said Bill Bishop, the editor of the Sinocism newsletter, referring to the Chinese practice of not allowing designated foreigners to leave China.

Aside from the new blacklist, China in recently days also escalated threats to stop selling the U.S. so-called rare earths — seventeen elements with exotic names like cerium, yttrium and lanthanum that are found in magnets, alloys and fuel cells and are used to make advanced missiles, smartphones and jet engines.

Analysts said it could take years for the United States to ramp up rare earths production, after its domestic industry practically disappeared in the 1990s. Roughly 80 percent of U.S. imports of the material come from China, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s official mouthpiece, carried a stark warning for the United States this week in an editorial about rare earths: “Don’t say we didn’t warn you.”

That commentary surprised China experts because the People’s Daily, which often signals official positions with subtly codified language, uses that phrase sparingly: It famously appeared before China launched border attacks against India in 1962 and Vietnam in 1979.

Damian Paletta contributed to this story. Shih reported from Beijing.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trumps-stunning-decision-to-escalate-trade-wars-with-china-and-mexico-signals-a-turning-point-for-us-policy/2019/05/31/d1e28270-83da-11e9-95a9-e2c830afe24f_story.html

2019-06-01 12:00:00Z
52780305137219

China Launches Investigation Into FedEx in Trade War Escalation - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

China Launches Investigation Into FedEx in Trade War Escalation  Bloomberg

China is launching an investigation into FedEx Corp. for the wrongful delivery of packages, the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported on Saturday. The U.S. express delivery company violated relevant Chinese laws and industry regulations by failing to send packages to correct addresses, the report said. That seriously harmed the legitimate rights and interests of its customers, and the relevant authorities decided to initiate an investigation, according to the report. Earlier this week, FedEx apologized for delivery errors on Huawei Technologies Co. packages following reports that parcels we...

View full coverage on Google News
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-01/china-launches-investigation-into-fedex-xinhua

2019-06-01 11:57:51Z
CAIiEKHGrdDRBFJrw7URsyg09gkqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

China Launches Investigation Into FedEx, Xinhua Reports - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. China Launches Investigation Into FedEx, Xinhua Reports  Bloomberg
  2. China to investigate whether FedEx harmed client interests: Xinhua  Reuters
  3. View full coverage on Google News

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-01/china-launches-investigation-into-fedex-xinhua

2019-06-01 11:42:34Z
52780307368915

China Launches Investigation Into FedEx, Xinhua Reports - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

China Launches Investigation Into FedEx, Xinhua Reports  Bloomberg

China is launching an investigation into FedEx Corp. for the wrongful delivery of packages, Xinhua reported. The U.S. express delivery company violated relevant laws and regulations of the industry in China by failing to send packages to correct addresses, the report said. That seriously harmed the legitimate rights and interests of its customers. The relevant authorities decided to initiate an investigation, the report said. Earlier this week, FedEx apologized for delivery errors on Huawei Technologies Co. packages following reports that parcels were returned to senders. Huawei had said it...


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-01/china-launches-investigation-into-fedex-xinhua

2019-06-01 11:11:03Z
CAIiEKHGrdDRBFJrw7URsyg09gkqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Buffett’s Charity Auction Breaks Record With $4.57 Million Bid - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Buffett’s Charity Auction Breaks Record With $4.57 Million Bid  Bloomberg
  2. How to Have Lunch With Warren Buffett  The Wall Street Journal
  3. Warren Buffett: His Best Investing Strategies, Stocks, and Advice  Motley Fool
  4. From software to soft serve, Bill Gates joins Warren Buffett in dishing up ice cream at Dairy Queen  GeekWire
  5. Warren Buffett's Charity Auction Bidding Surges Past $4 Million Level  Bloomberg
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-01/buffett-s-charity-auction-breaks-record-with-4-57-million-bid

2019-06-01 10:20:17Z
52780306777290

Justice Dept. Explores Google Antitrust Case - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is exploring whether to open a case against Google for potential antitrust violations, putting renewed scrutiny on the company amid a growing chorus of criticism about the power of Big Tech, three people with knowledge of the deliberations said Friday.

An investigation into how Google arranges search results could revive a case closed in 2013 by another government agency, the Federal Trade Commission. The five F.T.C. commissioners voted unanimously at the time against bringing charges against the company. Google agreed to make some changes to search practices tied to advertising.

But this year, with a new antitrust task force announced in February, the trade commission renewed its interest in Google. In recent weeks, the commission referred complaints about the company to the Justice Department, which also oversees antitrust regulations, according to two people familiar with the actions. The commission has also told companies and others with complaints against Google to take them to the Justice Department.

The task force had been looking into Google’s advertising practices and influence in the online advertising industry, according to two of the people. One of the people said the agency was also looking into its search practices. Most of Google’s revenue comes from advertisements tied to its search results.

A Justice Department spokesman, Jeremy Edwards, declined to comment, as did representatives for Google and the F.T.C.

The Wall Street Journal earlier reported on the Justice Department’s potential inquiry into Google.

If the Justice Department opens a formal investigation, it will be its first major antitrust case against a big tech company during the Trump administration. Google, Facebook and Amazon have come under intense bipartisan criticism, and calls to break up the firms have become a talking point in the race for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

Political leaders and consumer advocacy groups have criticized American regulators for inaction against tech companies. Google, Amazon and Facebook have faced stiff penalties from a variety of European regulators for antitrust and privacy issues. This year, European regulators fined Google 1.5 billion euros for antitrust violations in the online advertising market, the third antitrust move against the company by European officials in three years.

American regulators have been investigating Facebook’s privacy practices, and the outcome is widely seen as a test of the nation’s ability to police how giant tech firms handle user data. The F.T.C. is negotiating a settlement with Facebook that expected to be as much as $5 billion for failing to protect its users’ data from being used for political profiling by Cambridge Analytica, a British political consulting firm that had worked for President Trump’s presidential campaign.

There has been a wave of new antitrust scrutiny into tech companies in Washington, including a Senate hearing in May on digital advertising that featured accusations that Google engaged in anticompetitive practices.

The call to regulate and scrutinize Big Tech has also become a consistent campaign promise among Democratic presidential candidates, even longtime friends of Silicon Valley such as Senators Cory Booker of New Jersey and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts brought her “Break Up Big Tech” slogan to a billboard in San Francisco this week.

“Today’s big tech companies have too much power — too much power over our economy, our society and our democracy,” Ms. Warren wrote in a blog post on Medium this year.

When the F.T.C. announced the antitrust task force, the agency’s chairman, Joseph J. Simons, said it had been created because technology companies presented new challenges to decades-long regulation of antitrust. Companies like Google and Facebook offer free services and can argue that alternative search and social networks are a click away for consumers. That can complicate arguments that the services harm consumers or stifle competition.

The task force has started to steer complaints about Google to the Justice Department’s antitrust division. The department and the F.T.C. regularly negotiate over who has jurisdiction over antitrust cases, including investigations into competition violations and the review of mergers.

While some of the complaints against Google are years old, there has been a surge of new ones in recent months as concerns over Silicon Valley’s influence and power have grown, according to one of the people with knowledge of deliberations.

Stephen Kaufer, the chief executive of TripAdvisor, a company that has complained about Google’s practices in the past, said he welcomed the new scrutiny on the tech giant.

“TripAdvisor remains concerned about Google’s practices in the U.S., the E.U. and throughout the world,” he said in a statement, referring to the European Union. “For the good of consumers and competition on the internet, we welcome any renewed interest by U.S. regulators into Google’s anticompetitive behavior.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/31/business/google-antitrust-justice-department.html

2019-06-01 04:03:30Z
52780307146464