Senin, 29 April 2019

Spotify Technology S.A. Announces Financial Results for First Quarter 2019 - Business Wire

NEW YORK--()--Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT) today reported financial results for the first fiscal quarter of 2019 ending March 31, 2019.

Dear Shareholders,

Results for Q1 2019 were largely positive with most metrics outperforming our expectations and landing at the high end of, or exceeding, our Q1 guidance.1

MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS (“MAUs”)

MAUs grew 26% Y/Y to 217 million, slightly lower than the midpoint of our 215-220 million MAU guidance range.

We launched India in late February expanding our global market footprint to 79 countries. More than 1 million users signed up for Spotify in our first week in the market, and growth has continued to outpace our expectations. We now have more than 2 million users in India.

PREMIUM SUBSCRIBERS

Premium Subscribers grew to 100 million, up 32% Y/Y, reaching the high end of our guidance range of 97-100 million, and marking an important milestone in Company history. Outperformance was driven by a better than plan promotion in the US and Canada and continued strong growth in Family Plan. We also saw strong growth from the expansion of our Google Home Mini promotion, as well as the price reduction to our Spotify Premium + Hulu offering in the US.

In March, we extended our partnership with Google by expanding our Google Home Mini promotion to two new markets, the UK and France. The new promotional offer is substantially similar to the deal offered in the US in Q4. In the UK and France, new and existing Family Plan master account holders can claim a free Google Home Mini voice speaker. We believe that voice speakers are a critical area of growth, particularly for music and podcasts, and we intend to continue to pursue opportunities to expand our presence in that area.

We announced a significant step forward in our ongoing partnership with Samsung during Q1 whereby the Spotify app will be preloaded on millions of new devices globally. New users in the US who purchase Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S10 device with the Spotify app preloaded also will have access to a special six month free trial offer for Spotify Premium.

Additionally, we expanded our partnership with Hulu during Q1 by offering their limited commercial plan to our Standard $9.99 subscribers at no additional charge. This promotion replaces our existing $12.99 Spotify + Hulu bundle and builds upon the success and popularity of our Spotify Student + Hulu plan available in the US.

Family and Student plans continue their fast growth and have continued to increase as a percentage of our total subscribers. Churn was flat with Q4 and also roughly the same as Q1 of 2018.

FINANCIAL METRICS

Revenue
Total Q1 revenue of €1,511 million grew 33% Y/Y.

Premium revenue of €1,385 million in Q1 grew 34% Y/Y, the third quarter of accelerating Y/Y growth in the last four quarters. Average revenue per user (“ARPU”) was €4.71 in Q1, roughly flat Y/Y (down 2% excluding the impact from foreign exchange rates). Downward pressure on ARPU has moderated, and we expect that ARPU declines through the remainder of the year will be in the low single digits. As we’ve spoken about in previous quarters, the declines in ARPU are a result of shifts in both product and geographic mix. Approximately 75% of the impact to ARPU is attributable to product mix changes, and the remainder a function of changes in geographic mix and other factors.

Ad-Supported revenue of €126 million grew 24% Y/Y. We saw a small incremental benefit from podcasts during Q1 following our acquisitions of Gimlet Media and Anchor in February and the successful rollout of Spotify owned and exclusive content (The Joe Budden Podcast, Amy Schumer Presents: 3 Girls, 1 Keith, Dope Labs, etc.) We expect the revenue from podcasts to accelerate through 2019. Over time, our ambition is to develop a more robust advertising solution for podcasts that will allow us to layer in the kind of targeting, measurement, and reporting capabilities we have for the core Ad-Supported business.

Ad-Supported revenue growth underperformed our expectations in Q1, primarily in the US and primarily with our sponsored sessions video product. The performance shortfall was pricing related. We have course corrected and are seeing strong growth across the ads business in Q2.

Two of our strongest areas of growth in Q1 were measurement and programmatic revenues. Measurement related revenues doubled from 20% to 40% of total ad revenues Y/Y, while Programmatic and Self-Serve grew 53% Y/Y and now account for 26% of Total Ad-Supported Revenue.

In April of last year we officially unveiled a new Ad-Supported experience on Spotify. The updated user experience provided greater consumer control and an increased focus on curation and personalization. The net result has been a 12% increase in Content Hours per MAU across our free tier. This means accelerating growth in ad inventory, which should mean stronger Ad-Supported revenue growth.

Gross Margin
Gross Margin was 24.7% in Q1, above the high end of our guidance range of 22.5-24.5%. Outperformance relative to our expectations resulted from a combination of outperformance of Premium Subscribers, slower than anticipated release of original podcast content, and supply constraints of Google Home Mini devices relating to our Family Plan promotion.

Premium Gross Margin was 25.9% in Q1, down from 27.3% in Q4 and down 20 bps Y/Y. Ad-Supported Gross Margin was 11.1% in Q1, down seasonally from 22.1% in Q4 and down 160 bps Y/Y.

Spotify for Artists
In October 2018, we launched Spotify for Podcasters in beta, a platform that provides podcast creators with tools and data insights about audience demographics. Early adoption continues to gain momentum, as the number of podcast creators using the platform has nearly doubled in the first 6 months. More than 20,000 podcast teams are now using the platform on a monthly basis. Additionally, more than 50,000 shows have been submitted to Spotify through Spotify for Podcasters, enabling listeners around the world to discover new and unique content that suits their interests. Today there are more than 250,000 podcast titles available on our platform. In Q1 we launched 15 originals and exclusives including Podkinski in Germany, Gynning & Berg in Sweden, and our daily news podcast, Cafe da Manha in Brazil, a format we hope to expand to other countries in Latin America.

Last month Spotify for Artists launched a new feature called Unique Links. This tool enables artists to share a customized URL that links to a playlist featuring their track(s) at the top of the playlist. By offering greater personalization of Editorial playlists, we’ve increased the number of artists featured on playlists by 30% and the number of songs listeners are discovering by 35%.

In Q1 we continued to develop tools for Spotify Publishing Analytics. We introduced playlist add annotations which allow publishers to see when their songs are added to playlists and understand which playlists drive spikes in listening. To date we’ve seen engagement from 40 of the top music publishers around the world.

Operating Expenses / Income (Loss)
Operating expenses of €420 million in Q1 increased 30% Y/Y. Operating Losses totaled €47 million yielding an Operating Margin of (3.1%), an improvement of 50 bps Y/Y. Our better than expected loss in the quarter was a result of higher Gross Profit and lower than expected marketing spend.

The growth in our share price in Q1 significantly increased our operating expenses for the quarter. The increase in our stock price resulted in a significant increase of accrued social costs for stock options and RSUs. As a reminder, social costs are payroll taxes associated with employee salaries and benefits, including stock based compensation. We are subject to social taxes in several countries in which we operate, although Sweden accounts for the bulk of the social costs. We don’t forecast stock price changes in our guidance so material upward or downward movements can have an outsized impact on our reported operating expenses.

IFRS 16
Starting January 1, 2019, we adopted the new lease accounting standards dictated by IFRS 16. This required certain leases which were accounted for as operating leases be treated as finance leases going forward. Certain leases were reclassified as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet which yielded increased depreciation and interest expense, offset by a reduction in rental expense. We recognized €9 million of lease liability interest expense in finance costs during the first quarter of 2019.

Free Cash Flow
We generated €209 million in net cash flows from operating activities and €173 million in Free Cash Flow in Q1. Both more than doubled Y/Y. Free Cash Flow in Q1 benefited from the growth of accounts payable. We maintain positive working capital dynamics, and our goal is to sustain and grow Free Cash Flow, excluding the impact of capital expenditures associated with the build-out of new and existing offices in New York, London, Los Angeles, Stockholm, and Boston, among others. We paid out approximately €37 million associated with our office builds in Q1. We expect to complete these projects over the next 12 months at a cost of roughly €200 million. As a result, we are expecting a sequential increase in capital expenditures for office space in Q2 of approximately €25 million.

We ended Q1 with €1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and short term investments.

Q1 Investments Update
In Q1 the value of our Tencent Music (“TME”) investment increased by €652 million to €2.3 billion. The change in value was accounted for as a gain in Other Comprehensive Income. We also spent €308 million in total purchase consideration to acquire Gimlet Media and Anchor FM, and subsequent to the quarter end, we acquired a third podcasting company, Cutler Media, LLC (“Parcast”), for total purchase consideration of approximately €50 million. The combined purchase consideration for all three podcast companies was €358M which is roughly equivalent to Spotify’s cumulative FCF over the last three quarters, or alternatively, 55% of the Q2 increase in the value of our TME investment.

Growth of Global Recorded Music Market Accelerates
The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (“IFPI”) released its annual Global Music Report in April 2019. IFPI reported that industry growth accelerated to 9.7% in 2018 to $19.1 billion, an increase from 8.1% in 2017 and the fourth consecutive year of growth. While Physical declined 10% and Downloads declined 21%, Streaming grew 34%, and now accounts for 47% of all industry revenue. Streaming is the engine driving the growth in recorded music revenue and Spotify is the engine driving the growth in Streaming.

Q2 2019 AND FULL YEAR OUTLOOK

These forward-looking statements reflect Spotify’s expectations as of April 29, 2019 and are subject to substantial uncertainty.

Q2 2019 Guidance:

  • Total MAUs: 222-228 million, up 23-27% Y/Y
  • Total Premium Subscribers: 107-110 million, up 29-34% Y/Y
  • Total Revenue: €1.51-€1.71 billion, up 18-35% Y/Y
  • Gross Margin: 23.5-25.5%
  • Operating Profit/Loss: €(15)-(€95) million

Full Year 2019 Guidance:

  • Total MAUs: 245-265 million, up 18-28% Y/Y
  • Total Premium Subscribers: 117-127 million, up 21-32% Y/Y
  • Total Revenue: €6.35-€6.8 billion, up 21-29% Y/Y
  • Gross Margin: 22.0-25.0%
  • Operating Profit/Loss: €(180)-(€340) million

Our quarterly and annual guidance continues to include an estimate of the impact of social charges on our financial statements. This expense can vary materially from quarter to quarter based on fluctuations in the price of Spotify stock, which impacts our accruals for future expenses. Our forecast guidance ranges incorporate our best estimate of the impact of social charges on our income statement; however, material changes in the value of Spotify’s stock price could have an outsized impact on our reported profit or loss for the quarter and/or the year.

SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM UPDATE

On November 5, 2018, Spotify announced a program to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of its publicly traded shares. During Q1, the Company repurchased 1,019,409 shares at a total cost of $138.2 million and an average cost of $135.58 per share. In total, the Company has repurchased 1,706,680 shares at a total cost of $225.5 million and an average cost of $132.13 per share.

EARNINGS QUESTION & ANSWER SESSION

The Company will host a live question and answer session starting at 8 a.m. ET today on investors.spotify.com. Daniel Ek, our Founder and CEO, and Barry McCarthy, our Chief Financial Officer, will be on hand to answer questions submitted to ir@spotify.com and via the live chat window available through the webcast. Participants also may join using the listen-only conference line:

Participant Toll Free Dial-In Number: (844) 343-9039
Participant International Dial-In Number: (647) 689-5130
Conference ID: 4598466

Use of Non IFRS Measures

This shareholder letter includes references to the non-IFRS financial measures of EBITDA and Free Cash Flow. Management believes that EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are important metrics because they present measures that approximate the amount of cash generated that is available to repay debt obligations, make investments, and for certain other activities that excludes certain infrequently occurring and/or non-cash items. However, these measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, net income, operating income, or other financial measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. This shareholder letter also includes references to the non-IFRS financial measures of Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect, Premium revenue excluding foreign exchange effect and Ad-Supported revenue excluding foreign exchange effect. Management believes that Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect, Premium revenue excluding foreign exchange effect and Ad-Supported revenue excluding foreign exchange effect are important metrics because they present measures that facilitate comparison to our historical performance. Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect, Premium revenue excluding foreign exchange effect and Ad-Supported revenue excluding foreign exchange effect should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, Revenue, Premium revenue, Ad-Supported revenue or other financial measures prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Forward Looking Statements

This shareholder letter contains estimates and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. The words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “contemplate,” “possible,” and similar words are intended to identify estimates and forward-looking statements.

Our estimates and forward-looking statements are mainly based on our current expectations and estimates of future events and trends, which affect or may affect our businesses and operations. Although we believe that these estimates and forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us. Many important factors may adversely affect our results as indicated in forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: our ability to attract prospective users and to retain existing users; our dependence upon third-party licenses for sound recordings and musical compositions; our lack of control over the providers of our content and their effect on our access to music and other content; our ability to generate sufficient revenue to be profitable or to generate positive cash flow on a sustained basis; our ability to comply with the many complex license agreements to which we are a party; our ability to accurately estimate the amounts payable under our license agreements; the limitations on our operating flexibility due to the minimum guarantees required under certain of our license agreements; our ability to obtain accurate and comprehensive information about music compositions in order to obtain necessary licenses or perform obligations under our existing license agreements; potential breaches of our security systems; assertions by third parties of infringement or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights; competition for users and user listening time; our ability to accurately estimate our user metrics and other estimates; risks associated with manipulation of stream counts and user accounts and unauthorized access to our services; changes in legislation or governmental regulations affecting us; ability to hire and retain key personnel; our ability to maintain, protect, and enhance our brand; risks associated with our international expansion, including difficulties obtaining rights to stream music on favorable terms; risks relating to the acquisition, investment, and disposition of companies or technologies; dilution resulting from additional share issuances; tax-related risks; the concentration of voting power among our founders who have and will continue to have substantial control over our business; risks related to our status as a foreign private issuer; international, national or local economic, social or political conditions; and risks associated with accounting estimates, currency fluctuations and foreign exchange controls.

Other sections of this report describe additional risk factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties, nor are we able to assess the impact of all of these risk factors on our business or the extent to which any risk factor, or combination of risk factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. You should read this report and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different and worse from what we expect.

     
Interim condensed consolidated statement of operations

(Unaudited)

(in € millions, except share and per share data)

 
Three months ended
March 31,

2019

    December 31,

2018

    March 31,

2018

Revenue 1,511 1,495 1,139
Cost of revenue 1,138   1,096   856  
Gross profit 373 399 283
Research and development 155 100 115
Sales and marketing 172 163 138
General and administrative 93   42   71  
420   305   324  
Operating (loss)/income (47 ) 94 (41 )
Finance income 34 389 15
Finance costs (156 ) (2 ) (154 )
Finance income/(costs) - net (122 ) 387   (139 )
Loss before tax (169 ) 481 (180 )
Income tax (benefit)/expense (27 ) 39   (11 )
Net (loss)/income attributable to owners of the parent (142 ) 442   (169 )
(Loss)/earnings per share attributable to owners

of the parent

Basic (0.79 ) 2.44   (1.01 )
Diluted (0.79 ) 0.36   (1.01 )
Weighted-average ordinary shares outstanding
Basic 180,613,539   181,067,994   167,778,952  
Diluted 180,613,539   190,511,148   167,778,952  
 
         
Condensed consolidated statement of financial position

(Unaudited)

(in € millions)

 
March 31,

2019

December 31,

2018

Assets
Non-current assets
Lease right-of-use assets 430
Property and equipment 235 197
Goodwill 424 146
Intangible assets 54 28
Long term investments 2,299 1,646
Restricted cash and other non-current assets 70 65
Deferred tax assets 10   8  
3,522   2,090  
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 391 400
Income tax receivable 2 2
Short term investments 660 915
Cash and cash equivalents 966 891
Other current assets 52   38  
2,071   2,246  
Total assets 5,593   4,336  
Equity and liabilities
Equity
Share capital
Other paid in capital 3,834 3,801
Treasury shares (198 ) (77 )
Other reserves 1,491 875
Accumulated deficit (2,665 ) (2,505 )
Equity attributable to owners of the parent 2,462   2,094  
Non-current liabilities
Lease liabilities 555
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 1 85
Provisions 7 8
Deferred tax liabilities 61   2  
624   95  
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 397 427
Income tax payable 4 5
Deferred revenue 273 258
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 1,298 1,076
Provisions 44 42
Derivative liabilities 491   339  
2,507   2,147  
Total liabilities 3,131   2,242  
Total equity and liabilities 5,593   4,336  
 
     
Interim condensed consolidated statement of cash flows

(Unaudited)

(in € millions)

 
Three months ended
March 31,

2019

    December 31,

2018

    March 31,

2018

Operating activities
Net (loss)/income (142 ) 442 (169 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows
Depreciation of property and equipment 17 4 9
Amortization of intangible assets 4 4 2
Share-based payments expense 26 23 18
Finance income (34 ) (389 ) (15 )
Finance costs 156 2 154
Income tax (benefit)/expense (27 ) 39 (11 )
Other 8 15 1
Changes in working capital:
Decrease/(increase) in trade receivables

and other assets

35 (59 ) 15
Increase in trade and other liabilities 155 57 70
Increase in deferred revenue 13 17 9
Decrease in provisions (7 ) (3 )
Interest paid on lease liabilities (4 )
Interest received 4 3 10
Income tax paid (2 ) (1 ) (6 )
Net cash flows from operating activities 209   150   84  
Investing activities
Business combinations, net of cash acquired (288 )
Purchases of property and equipment (37 ) (65 ) (6 )
Purchases of short term investments (104 ) (300 ) (271 )
Sales and maturities of short term investments 383 66 430
Change in restricted cash 1 (1 ) (4 )
Other (4 )   (10 )
Net cash flows (used in)/from investing activities (49 ) (300 ) 139  
Financing activities
Payments of lease liabilities (5 )
Repurchases of ordinary shares (126 ) (72 )
Proceeds from exercise of share options 33 17 39
Other     4  
Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities (98 ) (55 ) 43  
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 62 (205 ) 266
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 891 1,095 477
Net exchange gains/(losses) on cash and cash equivalents 13   1   (10 )
Cash and cash equivalents at period end 966   891   733  
 
     
Reconciliation of IFRS to Non-IFRS Results

(Unaudited)

(in € millions, except percentages)

 
Three months ended
March 31,

2019

    March 31,

2018

IFRS revenue 1,511 1,139
Foreign exchange effect on 2019 revenue using 2018 rates (33 )
Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect 1,478
IFRS revenue year-over-year change % 33 %

Revenue excluding foreign exchange effect year-over-year change %

30 %
IFRS Premium revenue 1,385 1,037
Foreign exchange effect on 2019 Premium revenue using 2018 rates (26 )
Premium revenue excluding foreign exchange effect 1,359
IFRS Premium revenue year-over-year change % 34 %

Premium revenue excluding foreign exchange effect year-over-year change %

31 %
IFRS Ad-Supported revenue 126 102

Foreign exchange effect on 2019 Ad-Supported revenue using 2018 rates

(7 )
Ad-Supported revenue excluding foreign exchange effect 119
IFRS Ad-Supported revenue year-over-year change % 24 %

Ad-Supported revenue excluding foreign exchange effect year-over-year change %

17 %
 
     
EBITDA

(Unaudited)

(in € millions)

 
Three months ended  
March 31,

2019

    December 31,

2018

    March 31,

2018

Net (loss)/income attributable to owners of the parent (142 ) 442 (169 )
Finance income/(costs) - net 122 (387 ) 139
Income tax (benefit)/expense (27 ) 39 (11 )
Depreciation and amortization 21   8   11  
EBITDA (26 ) 102   (30 )
 
     
Free Cash Flow

(Unaudited)

(in € millions)

 
Three months ended  
March 31,

2019

    December 31,

2018

    March 31,

2018

Net cash flows from operating activities 209 150 84
Capital expenditures (37 ) (65 ) (6 )
Change in restricted cash 1   (1 ) (4 )
Free Cash Flow 173   84   74  
 

1 Free Cash Flow is a non-IFRS measure. See “Use of Non-IFRS Measures” and “Reconciliation of IFRS to Non-IFRS Results” for additional information.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190429005261/en/Spotify-Technology-S.A.-Announces-Financial-Results-Quarter

2019-04-29 10:00:00Z
52780280470257

Oil falls after Trump presses OPEC to make up for Iranian sanctions - CNBC

A Petrobras oil platform floats in the Atlantic Ocean near Guanabara Bay in Rio de Janeiro.

Getty Images

Oil prices fell on Monday, extending a slump from Friday that ended weeks of rallying, after President Donald Trump demanded that producer club OPEC raise output to soften the impact of U.S. sanctions against Iran.

Brent crude futures were at $71.59 per barrel at 0840 GMT, down 56 cents, or 0.78 percent, from their last close.

U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures were at $62.93 per barrel, down 37 cents, or 0.58 percent, from their previous settlement. 

Both benchmarks fell around 3 percent in the previous session. Trump said on Friday he told the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to lower oil prices.

"Gasoline prices are coming down. I called up OPEC, I said you've got to bring them down. You've got to bring them down," Trump told reporters.

"Spoke to Saudi Arabia and others about increasing oil flow. All are in agreement," the president later tweeted.

Trump's remarks triggered a selloff, putting at least a temporary ceiling on a 40 percent price rally in oil prices since the start of the year. The rally had gained momentum in April after Trump tightened sanctions against Iran by ending all exemptions that major buyers, especially in Asia, previously had.

Traders said the market was shifting its focus to the voluntary supply cuts led by OPEC, de facto headed by the world's top exporter Saudi Arabia.

"We are of the view that Saudi Arabia will increase output as soon as May, something they were likely to do anyway in the lead up to summer," ING bank said. "The Kingdom could increase output by 500 million barrels per day (bpd) and still be in compliance with the OPEC+ deal for the month of May." 

The cuts have been supported by some non-OPEC producers, notably Russia, but analysts said this cooperation may not last beyond a meeting between OPEC and its other allies, a group known as OPEC+, scheduled for June.

Russia has said it would be able to meet China's oil demand needs as Beijing tries to replace the imports it usually gets from Iran. 

"Russia appears to have every reason to resume ramping up production levels and the base case should start to become (that) we will not see OPEC+ agree upon extending production cuts, with tweaks to cover the shortfall from Iran," said Edward Moya, senior analyst at futures brokerage OANDA.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/29/oil-market-trump-opec-output-us-iran-oil-sanctions-in-focus.html

2019-04-29 09:14:22Z
52780277587131

Couples And Their Money Secrets: Financial Infidelity On The Rise - NPR

When Ann and Ed Coambs met 15 years ago, she was impressed that he had his financial act together: He owned a house, had a job and managed his budget.

But years later, after they married, Ann learned something that shocked her: Ed had secretly taken out debt and hid it from her for over a year.

Ed Coambs borrowed several thousand dollars on his business credit card — the only account he didn't share with his wife, Ann — without telling her. Courtesy of Ed Coambs hide caption

toggle caption
Courtesy of Ed Coambs

Ultimately, the truth came out: One night, after their three sons went to bed, Ed told her. Ann recalls the initial shock: "In a span of a couple minutes, you're like, 'What just got swept out from underneath me?' "

Then she got angry.

"Everything in me wanted to just yell and punch a pillow," Ann says — especially when she considered how he'd advocated for openness and transparency during their whole marriage. She wondered, "What else don't I know? What else is he hiding?"

"When that happened, the trust part was the hardest thing to get back," she says.

Getting it back required couples counseling, apologies, transparency and time. Even in forgiveness, Ann admits she resented repaying his debts.

"I feel like, 'You should bail yourself out for what you caused,' " she says.

Marital infidelity is well-known, but financial infidelity might actually be more common.

The few academic studies have estimated that as many as 41% of American adults admit to hiding accounts, debts or spending habits from their spouse or partner.

"It does seem that financial infidelity is on the rise," says Ted Rossman, an industry analyst for CreditCards.com. That company's recent survey found that millennials are nearly twice as likely to hide money or accounts from partners than other generations.

It's easier to conceal, Rossman says, because of technology: "You can sign up for the account, you can get the statements, you can do your spending — all without anything showing up in the mail."

Every couple might differ in how it defines financial infidelity. Typical cases often involve hiding compulsive shopping or gambling debts. In others, a spouse might siphon off cash from the family's funds for a secret purpose. Either way, when the deception is exposed, it often evokes feelings of betrayal and loss of trust that can lead to the dissolution of the relationship.

"It's hard to realize someone could be so fake to you, someone you thought you understood and could read," says Megan McCoy, a professor at Kansas State University who specializes in financial therapy, a new field that combines financial advice with family counseling.

Money signifies safety in retirement or a child's college education. "And that's why money fights are nastier and last longer" and why financial deception cuts deep, McCoy says.

That is painfully familiar to Ed Coambs. He met Ann 15 years ago at a party he hosted when they were living at opposite ends of Houston. At 23, Ed already had his finances in order.

This impressed Ann, who was three years older and saddled with dental school debt. "I thought, 'Gosh, I've hit the jackpot. This is amazing,' " she says.

Within two years, they married and settled in Charlotte, N.C. In the process, they navigated a few differences in how they wanted to manage their funds. Ed, for example, argued for joint accounts.

"I never had the idea that people would, in a marriage, keep their money in separate accounts or hidden from each other," he says. His parents had joint accounts, and anything else seemed foreign.

Ann, meanwhile, says she felt skittish about that, in part because she'd watched her parents fight over money during their divorce. But the money discussions with her own husband weren't acrimonious, she says.

"Eventually I got around to saying, 'OK, let's do this,' " Ann says. So all their accounts — including those for her dental practice — were all mutual and shared.

Ed stayed home with their young boys and helped her manage her business accounts while his wife supported them. Later, he returned to school to become a therapist, but his counseling practice was slow to take off.

"I had a period of struggle," he admits. "It had to do with my own insecurities and what it meant for me to be a provider or not being a provider." That's when Ed borrowed several thousand dollars on his business credit card — the only account they didn't share — without talking to his wife.

Ironically, the practice Ed was building was based on financial therapy — counseling for couples fighting about money. Meanwhile, over the following year, the debt grew to more than $20,000, but he didn't tell his wife about it.

In many ways, Ed says, he fell into some of the typical patterns of financial infidelity. He says many people justify financial unfaithfulness because there's a disparity in income or they feel deficient. He kept his secret under wraps, all the while hoping his business would grow and he could repay the credit card debt. Instead, the debt grew. Even to him, it made no sense. He feared how Ann — who referred to him as "Mr. Financially Responsible" — might react.

He says the strain of hiding isolated and depressed him.

"For the most part, people thought, 'Well, Ed's successful, he's smart, he's capable,' " he says. "Internally, nothing else felt further from the truth."

It has been over 2 1/2 years since Ed came clean with Ann over his debt. He says he has learned to empathize with those, like himself, who break their own moral code — and with people like his wife, who work hard to forgive. The Coambs say they agreed to tell their story in the hopes it might help others in a similar position.

To those still hiding in the shadows, they say: Come forward — the sooner, the better.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/04/29/716452865/keeping-money-secrets-from-each-other-financial-infidelity-on-the-rise

2019-04-29 09:09:00Z
CAIiEDHMiX9SkbwXqV-2glDb3IMqFggEKg4IACoGCAow9vBNMK3UCDCvpUk

Anadarko prepares to endorse $55bn bid from rival Occidental - Financial Times

Anadarko Petroleum is preparing to endorse a hostile $55bn bid from its rival Occidental Petroleum, putting its sale to oil major Chevron in jeopardy, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

The Texas-based oil and gas company is expected to make a statement this week after its board determined that a cash and stock offer from Occidental is superior to the $50bn deal it agreed in early April with Chevron.

A decision by Anadarko to endorse the Occidental offer would be a rare win for a hostile bidder, which are often rebuffed. Anadarko acknowledged last week that it had received an offer from Occidental, weeks after it had rejected takeover advances from the group.

Anadarko could not immediately be reached for comment, but last week it said it would “carefully review Occidental’s proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the company’s stockholders’’.

Occidental, one of the five largest US oil and gas production companies, offered to pay Anadarko shareholders $76 per share, a 22 per cent premium to the bid from Chevron, which is worth roughly $63 per share.

The bid from Occidental was evenly split in cash and stock. Chevron offered to pay 0.39 of its own stock and $16.25 in cash for each share of Anadarko outstanding. Anadarko has agreed to pay Chevron $1bn if it backs out of the deal.

It is unclear if Chevron will increase its bid for Anadarko. However, people with knowledge of the oil major’s thinking have said Chevron was unlikely to enter a bidding war for the assets, the Financial Times has previously reported. Chevron had earlier refused to raise its bid when it had heard Occidental had offered more than $70 a share for Anadarko.

Occidental chief executive Vicki Hollub has pricked investors' concerns that the group may take on more debt than it can handle in its bid for Anardarko © Scott Dalton/FT

A deal would give Occidental valuable shale oil acreage as well as assets in the Gulf of Mexico and a natural gas project in Mozambique. It would be the largest and boldest bet yet by Occidental chief executive Vicki Hollub.

“This is much more synergistic for us than any other company that might look at this,” Ms Hollub told the FT last week.

Occidental’s interest emerged just minutes after Anadarko announced its sale to Chevron earlier this month, but analysts warned at the time that they did not see how Ms Hollub could outbid her larger rival.

Ms Hollub has promised to sell assets worth up to $15bn if a deal to take over Anadarko is agreed, in part to win backing from Occidental shareholders who must sign off on the cash and stock deal.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.ft.com/content/8437fefc-6a43-11e9-80c7-60ee53e6681d

2019-04-29 06:18:10Z
CAIiEMzkTwZtHapyvyUGSanDwG8qFwgEKg8IACoHCAow-4fWBzD4z0gw0tp6

Minggu, 28 April 2019

Which Tech Company Is Uber Most Like? Its Answer May Surprise You - The New York Times

SAN FRANCISCO — Pop quiz: Which technology company does Uber, the ride-hailing giant on the cusp of an initial public offering, consider itself to be the most like?

Is it Lyft, its rival North American ride-hailing firm? Nope.

How about Didi Chuxing, Uber’s equivalent in China? Nah.

It’s Amazon, the e-commerce giant.

On the surface, the two companies have little in common. Amazon sells books, toilet paper, toys — pretty much everything, really — and it provides cloud computing services and makes artificially intelligent speakers. In contrast, Uber lets people hail rides through a mobile app.

But just as Amazon began as a modest online bookseller before growing into a digital retailing behemoth, Uber wants people to believe its ride-sharing business is the foundation for a larger “platform” spanning multiple transportation industries. Like Amazon, Uber is no stranger to taking on competitors across many areas to accelerate its growth. And also like Amazon, Uber is willing to lose geysers of cash to achieve its aims.

This Uber-is-like-Amazon argument will grow louder starting on Monday, when the ride-hailing firm’s top executives begin meeting investors on a so-called roadshow ahead of its I.P.O. next month. As part of its pitch, two people close to the company said, Uber plans to say that it is O.K. for it to lose money right now because — just like Amazon, which was unprofitable for years — it needs to burn cash to build out its business for the future.

Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber’s chief executive, has not been shy about the Amazon analogy.

“Cars are to us what books were to Amazon,” he said at a Fortune tech conference in July. “Just like Amazon was able to build this extraordinary infrastructure on the back of books and go into additional categories, you are going to see the same from Uber.”

Image
Amazon has always cared more about customers than Wall Street, which meant it was willing to spend aggressively to get ahead of competitors and create new businesses even if investors carped.CreditDemetrius Freeman for The New York Times

Uber declined to comment, citing the quiet period before it goes public. Amazon declined to comment on Uber.

Shawn Carolan, a venture capitalist at Menlo Ventures and an early investor in Uber, said the Amazon comparison is apt. “Because the ubiquitous need for transportation is so huge, they’re able to cross-sell different products to their existing customer base,” he said of Uber.

As it goes into its roadshow, Uber faces two main issues. One is that it needs to tell Wall Street a growth story — something to convince investors that its best and most lucrative days are still ahead of it. For years as a private company, that growth came easily as it expanded its service into more and more places across the world.

But nearly a decade later, that growth has slowed. In an amended offering prospectus on Friday, Uber said revenue growth in the first quarter was roughly 20 percent, less than half of what it was a year ago. As ride-hailing has evolved from a luxury business to a mass-market service, competitors have multiplied and the number of people using the service may be starting to max out as Uber finds fewer new locations to expand into.

Uber’s other issue is its lack of profit. The company lost $1.8 billion last year excluding onetime gains; it lost $1 billion or so in the first quarter of this year alone. Because ride-hailing is expensive to operate — Uber continually needs to spend to lure riders and bring on new drivers — some critics have wondered if it will ever be able to make money.

All of this explains why citing Amazon is so useful.

The Seattle-based retailer has always cared more about customers than Wall Street, which meant it was willing to spend aggressively to get ahead of competitors and create new businesses even if investors carped. Then just as Wall Street patience wore thin, Amazon produced profits that underlined the innovation machine that Jeff Bezos, its chief executive, had built over many years.

Image
“We want to kind of be the Amazon for transportation,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said.CreditAnastasiia Sapon for The New York Times
Image
Amazon’s chief executive, Jeff Bezos, invested in the business and made it seemingly impregnable in many areas.CreditJim Watson/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

In 2014, for example, Amazon was hit hard by investors amid slowing sales growth and the introduction of the Fire Phone, a smartphone that landed with a thud. Then a year later, Amazon disclosed how large and profitable its cloud computing business had become. For almost a decade, Amazon had plowed money into building data centers and an army of engineers and sales people. When it finally broke out the details of the cloud business, it turned out that Amazon Web Services had $5 billion a year in sales and was growing almost 50 percent a year, with fat margins.

Now all of Amazon’s investments over time have made it seemingly impregnable in numerous areas, from logistics and delivery to cloud computing. Wall Street is not complaining about Amazon anymore, and it has become one of the world’s most valuable public companies with a market capitalization of about $960 billion.

“Uber, like Amazon, operates with an obsession on customer value over anything else,” said Mitchell Green, a venture capitalist at Lead Edge Capital, which invested in Uber.

Amazon’s experience is meaningful for Uber as it also expands into new businesses to set the stage for future growth.

Those include Uber Eats, its restaurant delivery service. Started in 2014 as an experiment, it became part of a line of thinking that Uber could one day deliver anything and everything to people whenever they wanted it, at the touch of a button. Internally, that idea was called Uber Everything.

While Uber Everything stalled, Uber Eats boomed. The division is on track to book more than $10 billion in deliveries in 2019, up from $6 billion in 2018. It is also projected to take a 27 percent share of the food delivery market by the end of 2019, up from 3 percent in 2016, according to Wedbush Securities.

Uber is also building Uber Freight, a service that matches local truck drivers with shippers in the United States and the European Union. It has contracted with more than 36,000 carriers serving more than 1,000 companies, according to filings, and the business generated more than $125 million in revenue in the final quarter of 2018.

In addition, Uber acquired Jump, an e-bike and scooter company, last year and is working on autonomous vehicles. Mr. Khosrowshahi has said he plans to make Uber the hub for many modes of transportation, from cars to bikes to scooters to cities’ public buses, trains and subway systems.

On Friday, the company also said in its filing that it was working on its payments infrastructure, which is used by more than 91 million people to pay for rides and by the company to instantly pay its drivers.

While it invests in its future, Uber will continue to lose money. So the company needs Wall Street to put up with its spending on these initiatives before they potentially pay off with profit. And it needs investors to be patient as it also works to turn its core ride-hailing business into a moneymaker.

That leads back to the Amazon comparison. If Amazon can pull it off, so the thinking goes, then Uber can, too.

“Just like Amazon sells third-party goods, we are going to also offer third-party transportation services,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said in an interview with Recode last year. “We want to kind of be the Amazon for transportation.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/28/technology/uber-amazon-roadshow-ipo.html

2019-04-28 19:36:14Z
52780278331384