Minggu, 28 April 2019

Which Tech Company Is Uber Most Like? Its Answer May Surprise You - The New York Times

SAN FRANCISCO — Pop quiz: Which technology company does Uber, the ride-hailing giant on the cusp of an initial public offering, consider itself to be the most like?

Is it Lyft, its rival North American ride-hailing firm? Nope.

How about Didi Chuxing, Uber’s equivalent in China? Nah.

It’s Amazon, the e-commerce giant.

On the surface, the two companies have little in common. Amazon sells books, toilet paper, toys — pretty much everything, really — and it provides cloud computing services and makes artificially intelligent speakers. In contrast, Uber lets people hail rides through a mobile app.

But just as Amazon began as a modest online bookseller before growing into a digital retailing behemoth, Uber wants people to believe its ride-sharing business is the foundation for a larger “platform” spanning multiple transportation industries. Like Amazon, Uber is no stranger to taking on competitors across many areas to accelerate its growth. And also like Amazon, Uber is willing to lose geysers of cash to achieve its aims.

This Uber-is-like-Amazon argument will grow louder starting on Monday, when the ride-hailing firm’s top executives begin meeting investors on a so-called roadshow ahead of its I.P.O. next month. As part of its pitch, two people close to the company said, Uber plans to say that it is O.K. for it to lose money right now because — just like Amazon, which was unprofitable for years — it needs to burn cash to build out its business for the future.

Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber’s chief executive, has not been shy about the Amazon analogy.

“Cars are to us what books were to Amazon,” he said at a Fortune tech conference in July. “Just like Amazon was able to build this extraordinary infrastructure on the back of books and go into additional categories, you are going to see the same from Uber.”

Image
Amazon has always cared more about customers than Wall Street, which meant it was willing to spend aggressively to get ahead of competitors and create new businesses even if investors carped.CreditDemetrius Freeman for The New York Times

Uber declined to comment, citing the quiet period before it goes public. Amazon declined to comment on Uber.

Shawn Carolan, a venture capitalist at Menlo Ventures and an early investor in Uber, said the Amazon comparison is apt. “Because the ubiquitous need for transportation is so huge, they’re able to cross-sell different products to their existing customer base,” he said of Uber.

As it goes into its roadshow, Uber faces two main issues. One is that it needs to tell Wall Street a growth story — something to convince investors that its best and most lucrative days are still ahead of it. For years as a private company, that growth came easily as it expanded its service into more and more places across the world.

But nearly a decade later, that growth has slowed. In an amended offering prospectus on Friday, Uber said revenue growth in the first quarter was roughly 20 percent, less than half of what it was a year ago. As ride-hailing has evolved from a luxury business to a mass-market service, competitors have multiplied and the number of people using the service may be starting to max out as Uber finds fewer new locations to expand into.

Uber’s other issue is its lack of profit. The company lost $1.8 billion last year excluding onetime gains; it lost $1 billion or so in the first quarter of this year alone. Because ride-hailing is expensive to operate — Uber continually needs to spend to lure riders and bring on new drivers — some critics have wondered if it will ever be able to make money.

All of this explains why citing Amazon is so useful.

The Seattle-based retailer has always cared more about customers than Wall Street, which meant it was willing to spend aggressively to get ahead of competitors and create new businesses even if investors carped. Then just as Wall Street patience wore thin, Amazon produced profits that underlined the innovation machine that Jeff Bezos, its chief executive, had built over many years.

Image
“We want to kind of be the Amazon for transportation,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said.CreditAnastasiia Sapon for The New York Times
Image
Amazon’s chief executive, Jeff Bezos, invested in the business and made it seemingly impregnable in many areas.CreditJim Watson/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

In 2014, for example, Amazon was hit hard by investors amid slowing sales growth and the introduction of the Fire Phone, a smartphone that landed with a thud. Then a year later, Amazon disclosed how large and profitable its cloud computing business had become. For almost a decade, Amazon had plowed money into building data centers and an army of engineers and sales people. When it finally broke out the details of the cloud business, it turned out that Amazon Web Services had $5 billion a year in sales and was growing almost 50 percent a year, with fat margins.

Now all of Amazon’s investments over time have made it seemingly impregnable in numerous areas, from logistics and delivery to cloud computing. Wall Street is not complaining about Amazon anymore, and it has become one of the world’s most valuable public companies with a market capitalization of about $960 billion.

“Uber, like Amazon, operates with an obsession on customer value over anything else,” said Mitchell Green, a venture capitalist at Lead Edge Capital, which invested in Uber.

Amazon’s experience is meaningful for Uber as it also expands into new businesses to set the stage for future growth.

Those include Uber Eats, its restaurant delivery service. Started in 2014 as an experiment, it became part of a line of thinking that Uber could one day deliver anything and everything to people whenever they wanted it, at the touch of a button. Internally, that idea was called Uber Everything.

While Uber Everything stalled, Uber Eats boomed. The division is on track to book more than $10 billion in deliveries in 2019, up from $6 billion in 2018. It is also projected to take a 27 percent share of the food delivery market by the end of 2019, up from 3 percent in 2016, according to Wedbush Securities.

Uber is also building Uber Freight, a service that matches local truck drivers with shippers in the United States and the European Union. It has contracted with more than 36,000 carriers serving more than 1,000 companies, according to filings, and the business generated more than $125 million in revenue in the final quarter of 2018.

In addition, Uber acquired Jump, an e-bike and scooter company, last year and is working on autonomous vehicles. Mr. Khosrowshahi has said he plans to make Uber the hub for many modes of transportation, from cars to bikes to scooters to cities’ public buses, trains and subway systems.

On Friday, the company also said in its filing that it was working on its payments infrastructure, which is used by more than 91 million people to pay for rides and by the company to instantly pay its drivers.

While it invests in its future, Uber will continue to lose money. So the company needs Wall Street to put up with its spending on these initiatives before they potentially pay off with profit. And it needs investors to be patient as it also works to turn its core ride-hailing business into a moneymaker.

That leads back to the Amazon comparison. If Amazon can pull it off, so the thinking goes, then Uber can, too.

“Just like Amazon sells third-party goods, we are going to also offer third-party transportation services,” Mr. Khosrowshahi said in an interview with Recode last year. “We want to kind of be the Amazon for transportation.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/28/technology/uber-amazon-roadshow-ipo.html

2019-04-28 19:36:14Z
52780278331384

Technology's $1 Trillion Rally Keeps On Rolling With ETF Inflows - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Technology's $1 Trillion Rally Keeps On Rolling With ETF Inflows  Bloomberg

For technology stocks, the superlatives are endless this year. But rather than take profits and run, investors are flooding the space.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-28/billions-keep-on-coming-after-technology-s-1-trillion-rally

2019-04-28 17:05:00Z
CAIiEH_m2nDRpBbwFfHQzBZIsvwqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Chinese electric car maker BYD's first-quarter profit up 632 percent - CGTN

Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD Co Ltd, backed by U.S. investor Warren Buffett, reported on Sunday a 632 percent jump in its first-quarter net profit, buoyed by strong demand for its new energy vehicles.

The Shenzhen-based car and battery maker, which has a joint venture with Daimler AG in China, said last month it expected first-quarter profit to rise by up to nearly 800 percent.

Profit surged to 749.73 million yuan (111.4 million U.S. dollars), up from just 102.4 million yuan a year ago, when its earnings fell sharply due to cuts to subsidies for electric vehicles.

BYD said it expected half-year net profit to rise to 1.45 billion yuan to 1.65 billion yuan, versus 479.1 million yuan in the same period last year.

"New energy vehicles are expected to continue to sell well in the second quarter, and new energy vehicle sales and revenues continue to maintain strong growth," the company said in a stock exchange filing, adding that new passenger and commercial vehicle models will help boost revenue.

China's market for electric cars is booming, but profits in the sector have been squeezed by fierce competition between established firms and rival startups, as well as moves by Beijing to cut subsidies for the market to improve product quality and standards.

The company sold 117,578 vehicles in the first three months this year, up 5.2 percent from a year earlier. BYD, whose popular models include its Tang-series electric cars, has said it aims to sell 650,000 vehicles in 2019.

Overall electric car sales in China jumped 61.7 percent in 2018 to 1.3 million vehicles, according to China's top car industry body China's Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). It sees electric vehicle sales hitting 1.6 million this year.

China last month raised its standards for electric cars that qualify for subsidies and reduced the amount it is willing to provide to relevant companies.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d414e7a4d7a4d34457a6333566d54/index.html

2019-04-28 14:16:27Z
52780279791569

Uber's fresh IPO plans capped off Lyft's brutal first month on the stock market. Here's everything we know since its debut. - Business Insider

Lyft's performance since going public.Lyft's performance since going public.Business Insider/Yutong Yuan
  • Lyft went public one month ago Monday.
  • It's been an awful few weeks for shares since their March 29 debut, falling 35%.
  • Uber, Lyft's main rival, is primed to make its stock-market debut next month.
  • Here's what the last month has shown us about Lyft's early reception and what risks lie ahead.
  • Watch Lyft trade live.

Lyft shareholders haven't had much to cheer about since the ride-hailing company went public in its historic debut one month ago.

With the stock down 20% from its initial pricing and 35% since its opening trade, Lyft's brutal performance has set the tone for its larger rival Uber and a host of other companies to hit the public market this year.

And Uber is weighing on Lyft's stock even before its own debut. Lyft shares fell to a fresh post-IPO low on Friday after Uber updated its S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, saying it is now seeking a valuation of up to $90 billion — well below the $120 billion it had previously expected. Lyft shares saw a similar sell-off earlier this month when Uber first filed to go public

Read more: Lyft sinks to new low after Uber files to go public, highlighting Wall Street's competition concerns

But investors have learned more about how the market views Lyft, and where the stock might go from here once Uber begins trading. Here's what we know about short interest, competition, and more in the weeks since Lyft's debut on the public markets.

Exclusive FREE Report: The Self-Driving Car Race by Business Insider Intelligence

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.businessinsider.com/lyft-stock-price-everything-we-know-about-first-month-trading-2019-4

2019-04-28 13:00:36Z
52780278331384

Fidelity and Schwab Customers Can’t Get Vanguard’s Cheapest Funds - Barron's

Photograph by Lost Places

As a longtime Fidelity customer (and former writer for its web site), I’ve long appreciated the company’s customer service and wide array of investment choices. But when I tried to buy the Admiral class shares of a Vanguard mutual fund recently, I was politely told that it wasn’t available—no matter how good a customer I was.

Vanguard, it turns out, is keeping some of its lowest-cost products off the shelves of fund “supermarkets” like Fidelity and Schwab. While investors can purchase most Vanguard mutual funds at these firms, they will have to buy directly from Vanguard if they want the lowest-cost Admiral shares of its actively managed funds.

The situation is an odd one, and it’s a byproduct of changes that Vanguard made last year in its dual-class structure of mutual funds. Vanguard has long had two classes of shares: Investor and Admiral. Investor shares have lower investment minimums and higher expense ratios than Admiral. But Vanguard harmonized the two classes for its index funds last year: It lowered investment minimums for Admiral to $3,000 from $10,000, and started replacing Investor shares with the Admiral class. That, in turn, opened up the Admiral class of index funds to ownership and sales through third-party brokers like Fidelity and Schwab.

But Vanguard left its dual class structure in place for its actively managed funds, reserving the Admiral shares for purchase exclusively from Vanguard. Even if you meet the investment minimums, starting at $50,000, you’ll have to buy directly from Vanguard if you’re a “retail” customer, though advisers can gain access to Admiral through accounts that are custodied elsewhere.

The difference in annual fees can add up. Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt Fund (ticker: VWAHX), for example, is an actively managed municipal bond fund. It has an expense ratio of 0.17% in the Investor class versus 0.09% for Admiral. If you were to invest the minimum $50,000, the extra cost in the Investor class would be $40 a year.

Read our recent cover story: Fidelity Is Thriving. Here’s What It Needs to Keep Thriving.

That isn’t much in additional expenses, but it adds up for larger investments. Plow $300,000 into the Investor class of the fund and the extra cost jumps to $240 per year. For a $1 million portfolio, the additional expense would be $800 more in the Investor class. That doesn’t assume any capital gains or reinvested dividends that would grow the account and magnify the effect of saving a few hundred dollars in annual fees (something Vanguard stresses in much of its marketing materials and fund literature).

Vanguard, of course, has done more than any other fund company to exert downward pressure on fees. Vanguard says it runs funds “at cost,” and it routinely reduces fees when its own costs decline, pressuring other companies to lower fees to stay competitive.

But Vanguard is facing more competition in its core index-fund business. Expense ratios industry-wide have been declining for years. Several firms now sell index funds that beat Vanguard’s prices, including Fidelity’s new suite of zero-fee index mutual funds.

Moreover, Vanguard is still in the business of gathering assets, and it’s trying to keep investors in-house for its services, which have expanded to include more retirement and advisory products, along with more actively managed funds. Maintaining the exclusive rights to sell its low-cost Admiral shares for active funds is one way to prevent firms like Fidelity or Schwab from poaching client assets.

Editor's Choice

“Vanguard is saying, ‘Why should we offer our best priced item on someone else’s shelf when we want investors to stay with us?’” Daniel Wiener, editor of monthly newsletter The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors, tells Barron’s.

Brokerage firms, for their part, have scant incentive to make it any easier to buy Vanguard products. Not only does Vanguard compete against their funds, but Vanguard has never paid for fund distribution. Fidelity and other brokerage firms have long chafed at Vanguard’s refusal to pay for distribution. Some fund companies pay more than 0.15% of fund assets to be on Fidelity’s platform, for instance. Those fees are increasingly important to brokerage firms as expense ratios decline and investors migrate out of actively managed funds to low-cost index products.

“Vanguard doesn’t compensate us for the services we provide,” a Fidelity spokeswoman told Barron’s. “That’s why there’s a higher transaction fee for its funds,” she added, referring to the $75 fee that Fidelity charges to buy a Vanguard fund, well above its normal $49.95 rate.

Vanguard, for its part, appears unlikely to budge on making its Admiral-class active funds available at other firms. “There are no plans to do so at this time,” a Vanguard spokeswoman tells Barron’s. And the firm is plowing ahead with new actively managed funds, including one focused on commodities and another on stocks that screen well for environmental, social, and governance factors.

Both are likely to have Admiral shares that are available exclusively from Vanguard.

Write to Daren Fonda at daren.fonda@barrons.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.barrons.com/articles/vanguard-lowest-cost-funds-fidelity-retirement-schwab-51556315451

2019-04-28 11:00:00Z
CBMiYmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJhcnJvbnMuY29tL2FydGljbGVzL3Zhbmd1YXJkLWxvd2VzdC1jb3N0LWZ1bmRzLWZpZGVsaXR5LXJldGlyZW1lbnQtc2Nod2FiLTUxNTU2MzE1NDUx0gFmaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmFycm9ucy5jb20vYW1wL2FydGljbGVzL3Zhbmd1YXJkLWxvd2VzdC1jb3N0LWZ1bmRzLWZpZGVsaXR5LXJldGlyZW1lbnQtc2Nod2FiLTUxNTU2MzE1NDUx

Is This a Market Melt-Up? Here Are Some Ways to Tell - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Is This a Market Melt-Up? Here Are Some Ways to Tell  Bloomberg

Once again, stocks are hot. Following a drubbing late last year, benchmark indexes have been grinding higher as investors keep piling in, setting *fresh* all-time ...


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-28/is-this-a-market-melt-up-here-are-some-ways-to-tell-quicktake

2019-04-28 06:00:00Z
CAIiENssLcTWYzhFf2TqPIv2wLoqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM

Investors Brace for a Big Week of Insights Into World Economy - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Investors Brace for a Big Week of Insights Into World Economy  Bloomberg

The world economy's ability to rebound from its recent soft patch will be tested anew this week as data is released from Washington to Beijing.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-28/investors-brace-for-a-big-week-of-insights-into-world-economy

2019-04-28 04:00:00Z
CAIiEFAnmZeNk73o4D9ZwTt8bj4qGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM