Sabtu, 06 April 2019

Jeff Bezos' mistress files for divorce - Washington Examiner

Lauren Sanchez, who was reported to be having an affair with Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, filed for divorce Friday, just a day after Bezos and his wife finalized their divorce.

The Los Angeles-based news anchor, 49, and her husband of 14 years, Patrick Whitesell, both filled out the paperwork. The pair will be seeking joint custody of their two children, who are 13 and 11. Sanchez also has an 18-year-old son with former NFL tight end Tony Gonzalez.

The pair confirmed that they had already separated at the time the affair between Sanchez and Bezos took place.

MacKenzie Bezos announced she had finalized her divorce from her husband Thursday, tweeting out a statement saying Jeff Bezos keeps 75% of the company's shares and full control of the Washington Post.

In January, the National Enquirer informed the Amazon CEO of an impending expose of intimate text messages he exchanged with Sanchez.

“I love you, alive girl. I will show you with my body, and my lips and my eyes, very soon," he said in one text from April 2018. A month later, he wrote: “I want to smell you, I want to breathe you in. I want to hold you tight .… I want to kiss your lips …. I love you. I am in love with you.”

It later emerged that Sanchez's brother Michael had leaked the texts.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jeff-bezos-mistress-files-for-divorce

2019-04-06 13:44:00Z
52780260935513

Whole Foods shoppers blast Amazon's Prime member discounts as the company announces it's slashing prices - Business Insider

Whole FoodsShoppers are slamming Amazon's Prime member discounts at Whole Foods.Business Insider/Hayley Peterson

  • Some Whole Foods shoppers say they aren't saving any money with Amazon's Prime member discounts.
  • "There is no benefit whatsoever," said Claudia Cukrov, an Amazon Prime member who shops at a Whole Foods in Brooklyn, New York, on a near daily basis.
  • Spencer Somers said he has stopped scanning his Amazon Prime member code at Whole Foods. "I was scanning it every time, but it wasn’t worth the under $1 savings," he told Business Insider.
  • Amazon said response to the Prime member discounts has been positive, and that members have saved $100 million at Whole Foods since last summer. 
  • Amazon announced this week that it would slash prices by 20% on hundreds of items and double the number of Prime-member deals available to Whole Foods shoppers.

Some Whole Foods shoppers say Amazon's Prime member discounts are worthless, with customers claiming to save close to nothing on hundreds of dollars of purchases.

"There is no benefit whatsoever," said Claudia Cukrov, an Amazon Prime member who shops at a Whole Foods store in Brooklyn, New York, on a near daily basis.

She said her Amazon Prime member code, which she scans with every Whole Foods purchase, has never saved her any money. She accused Amazon of using the codes to collect data on what she buys, without offering any value in return. 

"They are building a full consumer profile on us in the guise of a discount," she told Business Insider.

Amazon rolled out Prime member discounts in Whole Foods stores nationwide last year, about 10 months after completing its $13.7 billion acquisition of the grocery chain in 2017. The discounts consist of weekly rotating specials on a handful of products, as well as an extra 10% off sale items.

Read more: Amazon's 10% discount for Prime members is now hitting all Whole Foods stores

Spencer Somers said he was excited when he found out about the new Whole Foods discounts last year. But nearly a year later, he has stopped scanning his Amazon Prime member code at the checkout of the Los Angeles Whole Foods store where he spends upwards of $100 every week. 

"I was scanning it every time, but it wasn’t worth the under $1 savings," he told Business Insider. "I know how data collection works. They want to look at my receipt and all the stuff I bought, so if that’s not worth a good amount of savings, then it's not worth me giving to them."

The concerns of Cukrov and Somers are echoed by dozens of complaints on social media. 

In a statement to Business Insider, Amazon said shoppers' response to the Prime member discounts has been positive. 

"Our Prime customers tell us they love the Prime member discounts at Whole Foods Market. In fact, Prime members have adopted the Whole Foods Market benefit at one of the fastest rates we’ve seen," an Amazon spokesperson said. "Since introducing Prime member discounts last summer, Prime members have already saved more than $100 million shopping at Whole Foods Market. And we expect Prime customers will save even more over the next few months."

Amazon announced this week that it would slash prices by 20% on hundreds of items and double the number of Prime-member deals available to Whole Foods shoppers.

Customers should expect more than 300 Prime-member deals in stores over the next few months, such as a 40% discount on asparagus and strawberries and a 35% discount on all Justin's branded products, the company said.

Read more: Amazon is slashing Whole Foods' prices by 20% on hundreds of items

Whole Foods shared the news with shoppers in an email sent Thursday with the subject line: "Prime Members: You Asked For More Deals."

"Weekly deals for Prime members are growing. As in multiplying. As in more big savings across the entire store. Turn down almost any aisle and — boom — you'll find a way to save," the email stated.

It remains to be seen whether the deals will win back customers who have already stopped scanning the Prime member codes. 

"So far I've only gotten a discount on one item I purchased," said Jean-Michel Boudreault, who said he shops at Whole Foods twice weekly in New York City. "It almost seems like a waste of time to pull up the barcode and show it to the cashier each time I shop there."

Here's what shoppers are saying on social media. 

Exclusive FREE Slide Deck: Future of Retail:AI by Business Insider Intelligence

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.businessinsider.com/whole-foods-shoppers-blast-amazons-prime-member-discounts-2019-4

2019-04-06 12:37:28Z
CAIiEJRP-wwdWzgHGU9tBJ3rQ2YqLQgEKiUIACIbd3d3LmJ1c2luZXNzaW5zaWRlci5jb20vc2FpKgQICjAMMJD-CQ

Stocks To Watch: Disney+ And Bank Majors Step Out - Seeking Alpha

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Stocks To Watch: Disney+ And Bank Majors Step Out  Seeking Alpha

Welcome to Seeking Alpha's Stocks to Watch - a preview of key events scheduled for the next week. Follow this account and turn the e-mail alert on to receive th.


https://seekingalpha.com/article/4253106-stocks-watch-disney-bank-majors-step

2019-04-06 12:39:00Z
CAIiEGplwvSnuVRJXt5Gy-BkrIsqFQgEKg0IACoGCAowkqEGMJBZMPCxAw

Report: Google Wifi was Eero’s ‘biggest challenge’ before fire sale to Amazon - 9to5Google

Amazon’s acquisition of Eero in February signified another big smart home entry by the online retailer following voice assistants and other connected devices. However, consumers decried the lost of another independent hardware brand. A new report today reveals that Amazon bought Eero in a fire sale, and that Google and Nest posed serious competition.

The acquisition price was never publicly revealed by Amazon or Eero, but Mashable this afternoon reported that it was to the tune of $97 million. The Verge has since confirmed that figure, which is lower than the $148 million that Eero raised in funding from investors.

Ex-Eero employees in today’s report considered Google Wifi to be the “biggest challenge.” The competing mesh networking solution from Made by Google had — and continues to — undercut Eero on price.

Announced in October 2016, Google Wifi shipped later that year for $299 as a three-pack. An identical package from Eero was $499, while a single unit from Google still $129 versus $199.

Compared to Eero, Made by Google created a single piece of hardware and did not make a distinction between hubs and beacons that are designed to expand existing systems. While Eero has since cut prices, with Amazon like to do the same, $299 still only gets buyers one eero and eero Beacon.

Google Wifi Eero competition pricing

Meanwhile, the Mashable report reveals how Eero tried to “remain a step ahead and diversify” its product lineup. The company was working on a smart home security system called Hive, but the Nest Secure was unveiled in September 2017. The competing project was soon abandoned, with Eero then proceeding to cut staff in 2018.

Both pieces are an interesting look at how hardware is a difficult market, with the Wi-Fi maker at the time of purchase having debt related to manufacturing costs. As a result of paying off $40 million in debt and other transaction costs, the actual sale price is reportedly closer to $54.6 million.

Nest Secure


Check out 9to5Google on YouTube for more news:

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://9to5google.com/2019/04/05/google-wifi-eero-competition/

2019-04-06 02:00:00Z
52780261737098

Jumat, 05 April 2019

Elon Musk just had a terrible week and it could easily get worse, fast - Business Insider

Elon MuskElon MuskBrendan McDermid/Reuters

  • Tesla's legal and financial troubles came to a head this week as the company's reported weak deliveries and its CEO went to Court in Manhattan.
  • This is a continuation of the company's troubles in 2019, and investors are starting to wonder about Musk's leadership and the company's cash position.
  • "This f---ing guy's crazy," one investor told Business Insider.

You should forgive yourself if this is the first time you're hearing that billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk — with his eyes staring straight ahead unblinking — went before a Judge in Manhattan on Thursday.

He was there flanked by his security guards and three lawyers. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was there, represented by three more lawyers. There were journalists and hobbyists and short sellers in the packed court room, all waiting to see if Judge Alison Nathan would hold Musk in contempt of Court for violating an order from the SEC.

The order was meant to stop Musk from making material statements about his car company, Tesla, on Twitter without approval from an attorney designated by the court. You'll recall that he caused company-wide chaos last August when he tweeted he had "funding secured" to take the company private, with the SEC later describing this and other tweets as "false and misleading."

But the SEC says he violated the rules in February, that Tesla would make 500,000 cars in 2019. It will not.

And we know it will not just because the company itself has announced lower projections (400,000 at the top), but also because of the other pressing disaster in Tesla land right now — it is not selling enough cars. 

The same day Musk sat in the courtroom Tesla's stock was falling around 9%. On Wednesday night — after two days of hemming and hawing — the company released its first quarter delivery numbers. They were worse than most analysts had imagined. Tesla delivered only 63,000 cars, about 31% lower than the quarter before. And most devastatingly, Tesla was hit the hardest on its most lucrative cars, the luxury — S and X — which saw their sales cut in more than half.

Given all of the problems on his plate it's no wonder Musk seemed relieved when the Judge deferred a decision on whether or not he was in contempt of court, and asked his lawyers to meet with the SEC once in the next two weeks to see if they could carve out a deal."Put on your reasonableness pants on," she said. Or she would decide Musk's fate.

Musk left the courtroom and promptly put out a statement dripping with vindication. "I have great respect for Judge Nathan, and I’m pleased with her decision today. The tweet in question was true, immaterial to shareholders, and in no way a violation of my agreement with the SEC..." it said. (Judge Nathan had not said any of that.) 

It went on: "We have always felt that we should be able to work through any disagreements directly with the SEC, rather than prematurely rushing to court. Today, that is exactly what Judge Nathan instructed.”

In a week of losses Musk could be forgiven for trying to eek out some kind of a win. Neither of Musk and Tesla's major struggles — legal or financial — are in any way resolved and even long investors are starting to worry.

"Yeah I own the stock. It's not one of my favorite positions. I just think the cars are leaps and bounds above everything else in this field," said Andrew Left of Citron Research, a man who went from short Tesla to long and loud about it.

"It would be better without Elon... I think this guy is just a big distraction. It kills me. It comes from the top ... the communication is terrible," Left raved. "This f---ing guy's crazy."

The legal issues could get worse, fast. The nightmare scenario in the coming weeks is that the SEC and Musk's lawyers can't come to an agreement and Judge Nathan rules him in contempt. 

The financial issues could get worse, fast, too. Tesla will release its Q1 balance sheet in the coming weeks, giving investors a clearer picture of the company's financial position. More bad news could send them running for the hills.

Have a story to share about working for or interacting with Tesla? Contact Business Insider's Linette Lopez at llopez@businessinsider.com.

asdfTesla's stock price 2019Tesla's stock price so far this year.Markets Insider

2019 was supposed to be chill at Tesla, not like 2018 when Musk "bet the company" on the success of the Model 3 car and Tesla was "near death"trying to make that happen. It seemed like that paid off when Tesla achieved its first consecutive quarters of profitability in Q3 and Q4.

But then things started going very wrong. There was a round of layoffs that culled 7%. Sales of more expensive versions of the Model 3 (which was initially promised to the public at $35,000) started to fall. Musk said he would shut down all the company's stores, and then he took it back. The price of the cars went down and then up again (there were literally protests in China over that).  There was an issue with customs in China that delayed sales. There was Musk's errant tweet, and Tesla's lawyer quit after being at the company for just two months. Then the SEC came knocking. If it sounds chaotic, that's because it has been. One of Tesla's loyal, top shareholders said that Musk "doesn't need to be CEO."

In short: Elon Musk's tenure as CEO has become tortured. 

Some investors are like Gene Munster of Loup Ventures. He still thinks Tesla and Musk need each other, but he considers their relationship a challenge as much as an asset.

"It's a catch-22," he told Business Insider. "It would be better if Elon weren't making it harder for himself. As an investor there are some things you need to concede, and you need to concede the stability of a regular company."

In court on Thursday Tesla submitted a letter of support for Musk, but the company itself had not been sanctioned by the SEC for Musk's tweet. That is why the SEC's attorney said Tesla had "for whatever reason thrown its lot in with Mr. Musk... and that is a problem." She added that the agency is still looking into whether or not Tesla shirked its duties by allowing Musk's errant tweet.

As a remedy the SEC suggested putting a new system in place to approve and monitor Musk's tweets. It also suggested a scale of fines if he tweeted misinformation again.

"The company definitely needs more professional management," Chester Spatt, a professor of finance at Carnegie Mellon and former chief economist at the SEC, told Business Insider.

"Musk's lawyers must also be afraid of him. They can't control him," Spatt continued. "I think there's a reasonable chance in the next two weeks that Musk and Tesla overplay their hand in negotiating with the SEC ... I think the SEC, by not trying to take him down, is giving a lot. But in effect Tesla has to comply with the prior settlement, no two ways about that."

Meanwhile, in the background of all this legal drama, the SEC and the Department of Justice are still investigating Tesla and Musk over whether or not they misled investors about the production of the Model 3. 

It is because of the Model 3 that Tesla is in dire financial straights right now. Tesla started out by making a more expensive, longer range version of the car, but it was initially marketed as a $35,000 vehicle for the everyman. Thousands gave the company a $1,000 to reserve one.

But that $35,000 car isn't here yet. And unfortunately sales of the higher margin long range version slumped in Q1. Tesla's luxury cars fared even worse. Analysts are starting to wonder if there is much demand for the cars that will actually make Tesla a profitable company.

"We are lowering our estimates and price target on Tesla shares today (to $200 from $215), reflecting the softer 1Q deliveries and flow-through of what we see as reduced underlying demand going forward for the higher ASP [average selling price] S & X," analysts at JPMorgan wrote.

Like all car companies, Tesla is expensive to run. It needs $1.5 billion to $2 billion on hand to keep the lights on. In March it paid off a $920 billion loan, and it has more debt coming due over the next year. That's partly why Moody's, a ratings agency, warned that despite Tesla's success in 2018, "meaningful pressures weigh on Tesla's credit profile."

And that was even before Q1 deliveries turned out to be a dud. The company is expected to report earnings in the coming weeks, and more bad news will put additional pressure on management to right its financial ship. Most likely it will bring up an old question — will Tesla raise money? The company used to say in no uncertain terms that it would not. Towards the end of last year it softened its stance.

"They're going to lose money March quarter and they didn't think they would. They may lose one in the September quarter too." Munster said. "Why they haven't [raised money] so far? They don't have as much money now as as they said they would six months ago."

Tesla needs money not just to survive, but to finance its plans. It's currently building a factory in China, for which it raised $500 million (due next March) from a syndicate of Chinese banks.

Elon Musk Model YMusk at the Model Y unveiling.Jae C. Hong/AP

It also recently unveiled a new car, the Model Y, which should start production next year. The Model Y's unveiling last month was in and of itself a sign of Tesla's tougher times. There was something missing.

It wasn't the cars. There were plenty of cars. Every model the company had ever made or proposed to make was trotted out for all to see; The Roadster, the Model S, the Model X, the Model 3, the semi truck. It wasn't the hype, because Musk, in a pair of custom made Jordans, was full of it. 

What was missing was the affair's usual whiz-bang finale. You see, in Tesla-land, at the end of every unveiling there is an "and one more thing" moment when the company gives the faithful one last wow, pulling another trick from its sleeve. But there was no thing this time, and Wall Street sent the stock down 4% the next day.

The market just didn't seem impressed anymore.

Have a story to share about working for or interacting with Tesla? Contact Business Insider's Linette Lopez at llopez@businessinsider.com.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-elon-musk-goes-to-court-and-deliveries-fall-in-one-terrible-week-2019-4

2019-04-05 18:40:48Z
52780261285434

Daily Crunch: The corporate fallout of the Bezos divorce - TechCrunch

The Daily Crunch is TechCrunch’s roundup of our biggest and most important stories. If you’d like to get this delivered to your inbox every day at around 9am Pacific, you can subscribe here.

1. MacKenzie Bezos giving ex-husband Jeff 75 percent of Amazon stock, voting control

MacKenzie Bezos noted in a tweet that her 26-year marriage to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has been formally dissolved. She added that she will be giving the executive all interest in the Bezos-owned Washington Post and privatized space company, Blue Origin.

The deal also finds MacKenzie giving her ex 75 percent of their joint Amazon stock, with Jeff also retaining voting control in her remaining 25, “to support his continued contributions with the teams of these incredible companies.”

2. Google pulls the plug on AI council that included Heritage Foundation leader

Critics questioned the inclusion of Kay Coles James, leader of the right-wing think tank the Heritage Foundation, on the eight-person panel. In response, the company has apparently chosen to drop the whole thing.

3. Snapchat launches Mario Party-style multiplayer games platform

The Snap Games platform lets you play real-time, multiplayer games while texting and talking with your friends. The platform is based on Snap’s secret late-2017 acquisition of Australian game studio PrettyGreat.

4. EU goes after Valve for ‘geo-blocking’ Steam activation codes

“In a true Digital Single Market, European consumers should have the right to buy and play video games of their choice regardless of where they live in the EU,” said Commissioner Margrethe Vestager in a statement.

5. Amazon reportedly readying its Alexa-powered answer to AirPods

A report from Bloomberg details the upcoming hardware, which sounds a lot like AirPods: a pair of small wireless in-ear buds, a case that doubles as a charger and built-in controls and a mic so you can control your music, talk to friends and ask Alexa things on the go.

6. Nintendo is bringing Zelda and Mario into virtual reality

Nintendo’s Labo VR kit may just be a little cardboard experiment, but Nintendo is taking a chance on throwing its most beloved titles into the headset.

7. The uncertain future of shared electric scooters

The rise of electric scooters is often compared to the rise of ride hailing, but there are some key differences at play. (Extra Crunch subscription required.)

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/05/daily-crunch-the-corporate-fallout-of-the-bezos-divorce/

2019-04-05 17:03:04Z
52780260935513

Jim Cramer: The Truth Is the SEC Has No Juice With Musk - TheStreet.com

Elon Musk, One, SEC Nothing.

That's the only way to describe the outcome of the contempt case brought by the SEC against Musk. When a federal judge says that the two sides should "put their reasonableness pants on," you have to wonder what kind of pants the SEC is wearing.

To recap, the SEC and Tesla (TSLA) settled on a procedure that would allow Musk to tweet after vetting. The tweets that needed vetting were those involving material information.

The most material information, the information that determines the direction of the stock, is deliveries. We saw that yesterday when weak deliveries caused the stock to drop the second largest amount this year.

That's why the SEC appended research reports to their brief just in case the judge didn't understand that deliveries are material and Musk chose to tweet a figure that no longer seems attainable.

The truth is the SEC has no juice with Musk. Judge Nathan's decision to throw it back to the SEC is like saying "We know you aren't able to rein him in and you are as unreasonable as he is so get it together."

I can't for the life of me figure out how the SEC can enforce its settlement with Musk and Tesla if the judge doesn't think it was reasonable to come to her and say that the agency can't stop him from tweeting. They don't really have any enforcement ability.

It's a huge win for Musk. He's virtually home free.

I am sure the SEC is steamed about this one. But they ran into a real brick wall.

Congratz to Musk.

Well done.

How Much Money Will I Need to Retire?

Want to learn about retirement planning from some of the nation's top experts? Join TheStreet's Robert "Mr. Retirement" Powell live in New York on April 6 for our Retirement Strategies Symposium. For a limited time, tickets are available for $99 for this full-day event. Check out the agenda, learn about the speakers and sign up here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://realmoney.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/jim-cramer-the-truth-is-the-sec-has-no-juice-with-musk-14918490

2019-04-05 16:57:39Z
52780261285434